Most people aren’t really interested in genealogies, usually because they find them boring and so, they tend to just skip over any long list of names they come across in the Scriptures. However, as I’ve mentioned before it was very important for the Jews to be able to trace their ancestry back in time to its beginnings.
In this chapter, we read about Esau’s genealogy and the rulers of Edom who were continually causing trouble for God’s people. It’s pretty difficult to identify some of these people mentioned because it was very common for people to change their names during this period of time.
Notice that Esau is called ‘Edom’ twice in the text, Genesis 36:1 / Genesis 36:8. This is simply to emphasise his genealogy and let the readers know that Esau became the Edomites, Genesis 25:30. The Edomites are mentioned one hundred and thirty times in relation to opposing Jacob’s descendants. They were a constant thorn in their side for many, many years until God finally destroyed them as a nation, Deuteronomy 23:7 / Numbers 20:21 / 2 Samuel 8:14 / 2 kings 8:16-22 / Obadiah 1-21.
Esau took his wives from the Canaanites, Genesis 36:2 / Genesis 26:34 / Genesis 28:9.
Clarke, in his commentary, says the following.
‘It appears that Esau’s wives went by very different names. Aholibamah is named Judith, Genesis 26:34; Adah is called Bashemath in the same place; and she who is here called Bashemath is called Mahalath, Genesis 28:9. These are variations which cannot be easily accounted for; and they are not of sufficient importance to engross much time. It is well known that the same persons in Scripture are often called by different names, Genesis 25:18 / Genesis 25:18.’
Eliphaz, Genesis 36:4, was also the name of one of Job’s friends, Job 2:11 / Job 4:1 / Job 15:1. Reuel, Genesis 36:4, was also the name of Moses’ father-in-law, Exodus 2:18. Notice also that Jacob and Esau separate from one another because there wasn’t enough space in the land for both of them, Genesis 36:6-8.
Here we have a continuation of the descendants of Esau through Eliphaz, Genesis 36:10. It was from his second wife, Timna, he had Amalek, Genesis 36:12, who would eventually become enemies of Israel when they came out of captivity, Deuteronomy 25:17 / Deuteronomy 25:19 / Exodus 17:8-16.
Clarke, in his commentary, says the following.
‘As Timna was sister to Lotan the Horite, Genesis 36:22, we see how the family of Esau and the Horites got intermixed. This might give the sons of Esau a pretext to seize the land, and expel the ancient inhabitants, as we find they did, Deuteronomy 2:12.’
The KJV uses the word, ‘duke’ whilst the NIV uses the word, ‘chiefs’, Genesis 36:15. It really makes no difference when we understand what is being written as a whole. The focus here is on the fathers because they established extended families, which simply means that each of the families are being led by a father or as the text says a chief. In other words, the fathers were the head of the household and were responsible for leading their families.
A person of interest here, is Teman, who was the oldest son of Eliphaz, Genesis 36:15. He was later to become a very powerful tribe, he was so powerful that the land of Edom was sometimes called Teman, Amos 1:12 / Obadiah 1:9.
It’s obvious that the Horites already lived in the land, Genesis 36:20, and it seems that they have intermarried with Esau’s descendants. And so, what we have here is what many would call, dual heritage families, where any child being born will have different cultured parents.
Please note that Zibeon is called a Hivite in Genesis 36:2, and a Horite in Genesis 36:20. It seems that Hivite is an alternative word for Horite, and both are applied where ‘Hurrians’ are involved.
Clarke, in his commentary, says the following.
‘These Horites were the original inhabitants of the country of Seir, called the land of the Horites, and afterwards the land of the Idumeans, when the descendants of Esau had driven them out. These people are first mentioned Genesis 14:6.’
Note that most modern translations says that Anah discovered the hot springs in the desert while he was grazing the donkeys of his father Zibeon, Genesis 36:24. The KJV version says Anah found the mules in the wilderness. There are many opinions on this, and the matter may never be settled as to which one is correct.
Here we read a list of the names of kings who reigned in Edom before any Israelite king reigned, Genesis 36:31 / 1 Chronicles 1:43-50.
Something which is often overlooked here in this text is that every single one of the kings mentioned was actually succeeded by another king who was not his son. Also, notice that the capital city of the kingdom was moved with the consent of each new king.
Constable, in his commentary, says the following.
‘This list of Edomite kings demonstrates the partial fulfilment of God’s promise that kings would come from Abraham’s loins, Genesis 17:16.’
The inclusion of women’s names, Timna and Oholibamah, Genesis 36:40-41, as titles of certain chiefs, shows that the chief took his title from the tribal mother in some cases.