
Here Solomon begins to build his own palace and straight away we see that it took thirteen years to complete, 1 Kings 7:1. This tells us how extravagant his palace was and although we don’t know exactly how it looked, we know that it was very complex and it housed the many people who were a part of Solomon’s royal court. Remember David had spent years collecting money and materials for the temple, but this wasn’t the case for Solomon’s palace. It took almost twice as long to build as the temple and I’m pretty sure it would have almost cost twice as much.
Within his palace, there were several different houses and projects, a house of the forest of Lebanon, 1 Kings 7:2-5, a colonnade and portico, 1 Kings 7:6, a throne hall and a hall of justice, 1 Kings 7:7, Solomon’s own palace and living space, 1 Kings 7:8, and a house for Pharaoh’s daughter, 1 Kings 7:8. No one knows why he chose to build a house only for Pharaoh’s daughter when he had seven-hundred other wives to look after, 1 Kings 11:3.
Barnes, in his commentary, says the following.
‘Many have supposed that the buildings mentioned in 1 Kings 7:1-2 / 1 Kings 7:8, were three entirely distinct and separate buildings. But it is perhaps best to consider the ‘house’ of 1 Kings 7:1, as the palace proper, Solomon’s own dwelling-house, 1 Kings 7:8, the house of 1 Kings 7:2, as the state apartments and the house for Pharaoh’s daughter as the hareem or zenana and to regard these three groups of buildings as distinct, though interconnected, and as together constituting what is else-where termed ‘the king’s house’, 1 Kings 9:10.’
All these structures, from the outside to the great courtyard and from foundation to eaves, were made of blocks of high-grade stone cut to size and smoothed on their inner and outer faces, 1 Kings 7:9. The foundations were laid with large stones of good quality, some measuring ten cubits, that is, fifteen feet and some eight, that is twelve feet, 1 Kings 7:10. Above were high-grade stones, cut to size, and cedar beams, 1 Kings 7:11.
The great courtyard was surrounded by a wall of three courses of dressed stone and one course of trimmed cedar beams, as was the inner courtyard of the temple of the LORD with its portico, 1 Kings 7:12. It’s difficult to imagine what his palace would have looked it, but it was certainly big enough to home all these people.
Barnes, in his commentary, says the following.
‘The palace, like the temple, had two courts 1 Kings 6:36, not, however, one immediately within the other. The lesser court of the palace seems to have been a private inner court among the buildings, 1 Kings 7:8. The greater court was outside all the buildings, surrounding the palace on every side. Assyrian palaces had always such an external court, and had generally one or more inner courts or quadrangles.’
After reading these verses, especially the verse which describes the articles of the temple, it becomes clear, that the temple itself was somehow connected to Solomon’s palace, 2 Chronicles 3:15 / 2 Chronicles 3:17 / 2 Chronicles 4:2-5. Huram’s father was from Tyre, but his mother was a widow of the tribe of Naphtali, 1 Kings 7:13-14, and she is also described as being of the daughters of Dan, 2 Chronicles 2:14, which means that she was of the tribe of Dan by birth but was a living in the territory of Naphtali.
Because of Huram’s reputation as a very skilled metal worker, 1 Kings 7:13, and was filled with wisdom, understanding and knowledge to do all kinds of bronze work, 1 Kings 7:14 / 2 Chronicles 2:13 / 2 Chronicles 4:16, Solomon hired him to carry out the duties in making the articles mentioned, 1 Kings 7:14-45.
It’s worth noting that the bronze he uses to make the bronze pillars, 1 Kings 7:15-22 / 1 Kings 7:41-42, the Sea, 1 Kings 7:23-25 / 1 Kings 7:39 / 1 Kings 7:44, and various bronze articles were from the time when David had taken the bronze from the cities of Hadarezer, 1 Chronicles 18:8.
Notice that the two pillars which were placed in front of the temple were given names, ‘Jachin’ and ‘Boaz’, 1 Kings 7:21. These names may be very symbolic, ‘Jachin’ possibly signified that the temple would stand forever and ‘Boaz’ possibly signified that God gives the temple strength and endurance.
There are a couple of other ideas concerning these names, some believe that the name ‘Jachin’ refers to God establishing the throne of the king forever and the name ‘Boaz’ refers to the strength of God in which the king would rejoice. If there are any symbolising in these names, they all carry the idea of the king standing between God and His people.
Barnes, in his commentary, says the following.
‘These famous pillars, which were broken in pieces by the Babylonians when they destroyed Jerusalem, 2 Kings 25:13 / Jeremiah 52:17, were probably for ornament, standing by themselves under or in front of the porch.’
Huram made a sea out of cast bronze, 1 Kings 7:23-25 / 1 Kings 7:39 / 1 Kings 7:44. This was designed as a great bowl, some fifteen feet across at the top. It was huge and if the measurements are correct, it would be able to hold around ten thousand gallons of water. The purpose behind this great bowl was to supply water for ceremonial cleansing purposes, 2 Chronicles 4:6.
Barnes, in his commentary, says the following.
‘The ‘molten sea’ of Solomon, so called from its great size, took the place of the laver of the tabernacle, Exodus 30:18-21, which was required for the ablutions of the priests.’
Why Solomon ordered that these images of lions and bulls be built into the panels, 1 Kings 7:29 / 1 Kings 7:36, is not certain, some believe this was idolatry, Exodus 2:4-5 / 1 Kings 12:28-29. Josephus charged Solomon with a breach of the Commandment, Exodus 20:4-5, on account of the oxen here and the lions for his throne. The charge expresses the prohibition which some Jews have conceived the Commandment to urge against the arts of sculpture and painting.
Barnes, in his commentary, says the following, concerning the pomegranates, 1 Kings 7:18 / 1 Kings 7:20 / 1 Kings 7:42 / 2 Chronicles 4:13.
‘The pomegranate was one of the most common ornaments in Assyria. It was used on quivers, on spear-shafts, and mace heads, in patterns on doorways and pavements, etc. It is doubtful whether a symbolic meaning was attached to it, or whether it was merely selected as a beautiful natural form.’
The portable basins had wheels on them, 1 Kings 7:30-33, so that they could be wheeled to different parts of the temple in order to provide water for washing during and after the sacrifices. The ten bronze basins were smaller bowls, 1 Kings 7:38-39, that were used for convenient cleansing purposes for the priest when he was away from the Sea bowl, the great bowl of water.
The sprinkling bowls, 1 Kings 7:40 / 1 Kings 7:45 / 1 Kings 7:50 / 2 Chronicles 4:8 / 2 Chronicles 4:22, which held water, were scattered around the temple so the priests could prepare the many sacrifices that were offered in reference to the temple service. The pots were the caldrons in which it was usual to boil the peace-offerings, 1 Samuel 2:13-14.
Clarke, in his commentary, says the following.
‘These were set on the ten bases or pedestals, and were to hold water for the use of the priests in their sacred office, particularly to wash the victims that were to be offered as a burnt-offering, as we learn from 2 Chronicles 4:6 but the brazen sea was for the priests to wash in. The whole was a building of vast art, labour, and expense.’
When Huram finished all the work he had undertaken for Solomon in the temple of the LORD, 1 Kings 7:40, it’s clear that the building of Solomon’s palace and all the furnishes was really a remarkable undertaking, 2 Chronicles 4:17-22/ 2 Chronicles 5:1 / 2 Chronicles 4:6 / 2 Chronicles 4:10-5:1.
There’s no doubt that Solomon chose wisely in hiring Huram to help with the furnishings of the temple because he was a very talented skilled metal worker, 1 Kings 7:13-14. Some translations use the word ‘bronze’, and other translations use the word ‘brass’, but this doesn’t really matter, because brass is a term that is used to describe any copper alloy.
Barnes, in his commentary, says the following concerning the four hundred pomegranates, 1 Kings 7:42.
‘The ‘four hundred’, 1 Kings 7:42 / 2 Chronicles 4:13, are obtained by counting the pomegranates of both pillars together. In Jeremiah 52:23, is an account of the arrangement of a single row of pomegranates, whereof each pillar had two.’
Solomon had them cast between Succoth and Zarethan, 1 Kings 7:46 / Judges 7:22 / Judges 8:5. These places were quarries where he had mined the huge amount of copper needed for all the furnishings. There was also articles of gold within the temple, the golden altar, 1 Kings 7:48, the golden lampstands, 1 Kings 7:48-49 / 2 Chronicles 4:19-22, gold basins and sockets, 1 Kings 7:50 / 2 Chronicles 4:7-8 / 2 Chronicles 4:19-22. Some of this gold along with some silver, 1 Kings 7:51, came from all the kingdoms which David had earlier conquered, 2 Samuel 8:9-12.
Notice that the gold lampstands Solomon had made for the temple had ten branches, 1 Kings 7:48-49. We don’t know why Solomon did this because Exodus 25:31-32, tells us that God asked for the lampstands to have only three branches on each side. When the Jews rebuilt the temple after the Babylonian captivity, they not only put the veil that Solomon didn’t make, back to where it belongs between the holy place and the most holy place, Exodus 26:31-35 / Matthew 27:51, but they also put in a seven-branched lampstand.
Notice also that Solomon had brought everything David had dedicated and placed them in the treasuries of the Lord’s temple, 1 Kings 7:51 / 1 Chronicles 28:14-18. This gives us the impression that the temple also functioned as some kind of national treasury, 1 Chronicles 26:28. We know that the temple functioned as a community centre for the people and so the people would deposit their valuables there.
Clarke, in his commentary, says the following.
‘The temple was built in some measure on the model of the tabernacle, and dedicated to the same use, Exodus 25-27 / Exodus 35-39.’