There was obviously something about Jesus’ prayer life which caught His disciples attention. The Lord then proceeds to utter a prayer very similar to the one Matthew records, Matthew 6:9-14. As Jesus finished praying in a certain place, one Hs disciples as Him to teach them how to pray, just as John had taught his disciples, Luke 11:1.
The fact that Jesus responds to His disciples’ request implies that we can learn how to pray. It isn’t a gift that is possessed by some and not by others but a talent in which we may grow and develop. In addition to the principles of prayer that Jesus shared with His disciples, He also offered an example for them to consider and learn from.
There are a few religious groups who repeat this prayer every time they meet together, but Jesus never intended for these words to be recited week in and week out. If He wanted this prayer to be recited, then this would go against everything He taught earlier about vain repetition in prayer, Matthew 6:7. We would call it a model prayer because the prayer itself reminds us of what our prayers should be about.
When Jesus prayed, He always addressed the heavenly Father, Luke 11:2 / Matthew 6:9, and He did so in a reverent manner, Psalm 145:1 / Mark 14:36. God is our Father and we are His children. Many times, Jesus got into trouble with the religious leaders because He called God, His Father. This is all about our relationship with God and so, when we pray, it’s always good to begin our prayer by recognising who He is and who we are in relation to Him.
The word ‘hallowed’, Luke 11:2 / Matthew 6:9, is similar to the word ‘holy,’ which means to be separate for God’s purpose, to be dedicated to Him. Remember that God is a Holy God and His name is holy and He deserves our respect because He is in heaven.
It’s here we see the balance of our relationship with the Lord, yes, He is our Father, but He is also to be hallowed by us, kept holy, we must respect Him when we’re speaking to Him in prayer. God’s Name should be considered holy, it is not common or something to be treated lightly. When we address the Father in prayer, we should be as respectful as possible.
After all, we’re not just speaking to anybody but to the Almighty, the only true and living God! If we give respect and honour to our earthly father, how much more should we give to God!
Jesus told then to pray that God’s kingdom come, Luke 11:2 / Matthew 6:10. At the time these instructions were given to the disciples, the kingdom of God hadn’t yet come, Matthew 16:18-19 / Mark 9:1 / Acts 2. The kingdom of God has come, and Christ is now reigning, Colossians 1:13 / 1 Corinthians 15:24-25. Instead, we should pray that the kingdom is enlarged.
Notice also that God is the focal point in the prayer, we start by praising Him, for who He is, whilst recognising His holiness and then we pray that God’s deepest desires and will for mankind, will be established on earth, just as it has been established in heaven. To know what the Lord’s will is, we need to study His Word, Romans 12:1-2, and spend time with mature Christians.
Notice how we’ve moved from the focus of being on God to ourselves in Luke 11:3 / Matthew 6:11. Notice that He speaks our our daily needs. In the A.A. they have a saying which says, ‘keep it in the day,’ which basically means take one day at a time. I think that’s good advice because this is what Jesus says over and over again, Matthew 6:28-34.
Notice our daily needs are the basic requirements for life, food, clothing and drink. When the Israelites were in the desert God provided Manna ‘daily’, Exodus 16:21. The petition for ‘daily bread’, Matthew 6:11, isn’t for milk and honey, the symbols of luxury, but for bread that will be sufficient for this day, Exodus 16:12-31.
God will supply all necessary daily needs if we seek His kingdom first, Matthew 6:25-33 / Philippians 4:19. Of course, we must realise that there is a difference between our wants and our needs. We must be careful not to let prosperity interfere with thankfulness for daily needs, Proverbs 30:8-9.
None of us has a promise that we’ll be here tomorrow that’s why we have to learn to live and rely on God ‘one day at a time’, as Lina Martell once sang. God is the one who is the giver of all blessings and He’s the one who will take care of our needs, but we need to learn to put our trust in God to provide what we need today, even though there may be times when we can’t see what will happen tomorrow, 1 Timothy 6:7.
Our sins are like spiritual debts to God, Luke 11:4 / Matthew 18:21-35. Jesus elaborates upon this thought immediately after the close of this model prayer. It’s difficult enough to pray for forgiveness when our hearts are broken because we know we’ve hurt God with our actions or thoughts, but it’s even more difficult to forgive those who have hurt us, especially if they are Christians who should know better.
But notice the condition that Jesus places upon our prayer for forgiveness, He says we can only ask for forgiveness when we have also shown forgiveness toward others, Luke 11:4 / Matthew 6:12. In other words, we can’t expect God to forgive us, if we’re not willing to forgive others.
Now we can fight and try and justify our unforgiveness to others but notice that Jesus stresses this point again in Matthew 6:14-15. It never ceases to amaze me that people hold on to grudges for years, I was speaking to someone recently who was telling me about a brother really offending him many years ago and he still has the emails to prove it!
We need to remember that we have all sinned against each other at one time or another and we need forgiveness as much as the next person. Do we really believe that God will forgive us if we’re holding people’s sins against them? Yes, it’s hard, yes, we can’t forget, as God can forget, but we must forgive, otherwise, there’s no forgiveness for us. Jesus is also teaching us here that we need to admit that we sin, and we too need forgiveness and so when we become Christians confessing our sins to God is really important, otherwise, no forgiveness will be available to us, 1 John 1:8-10.
Jesus made this request of the Father, ‘Do not lead us into temptation’, Luke 11:4 / Matthew 6:13. This request may seem somewhat troubling in light of James 1:13. Why would anyone pray that the Father does not lead him or her into temptation if God does not tempt anyone in the first place? The solution is that this phrase could be translated, as ‘Do not lead us into trials’. There are plenty of trials to deal with in life without us praying for anymore! Of course, when trials are present, we learn to face them joyfully, James 1:2-4.
Jesus isn’t saying that God will lead us into temptation, James 1:13, but what He is saying is that we need to ask God for deliverance from temptation, in order to help us with our weaknesses, and to strengthen us against the works of the devil. If we want to resist the devil so that he flees from us, we need to stay close to God and submit to His ways, James 4:7-10.
Many people misinterpret, 1 Corinthians 10:13, wrongly. Yes, we all get tempted, yes, God won’t allow us to be tempted beyond what we can bear, but He doesn’t provide a way of escape from the temptation. The Greek text in 1 Corinthians 10:13, implies that God will give you the strength to endure the temptation, in other words, God will be with you and help you through that temptation.
Prayer is critical in the life of the Christian and the ‘Lord’s Prayer’ or maybe we should call the ‘disciple’s prayer’, after all, He’s teaching them how to pray, and we see the example of how to pray. May we always be mindful of the beauty of simplicity when it comes to talking to Him, as well as the benefits of seclusion.
Let’s strive to recognise God’s awesome nature in our prayers as well as His plan for our lives. May we appreciate the providence of God which sustains us on a daily basis and utter prayers that reflect our reliance both physically and spiritually upon Him. Let’s strive to manifest a gracious disposition to others as we endeavour to more fully comprehend our own personal need for forgiveness.
Jesus now moves on to share a parable with His disciples concerning prayer which is commonly called, ‘The Parable of the Friend at Midnight’. We must remember that hospitality was very important in ancient near eastern society. The man has a friend who arrived on a journey and the man has no food to give him, Luke 11:5-6. It is the middle of the night and so, the friend says he won’t get up and give him anything because the door is shut and the children are in bed with them, Luke 11:7.
The man’s house is possibly a one room house, hence, the whole family would sleep together in one bed or it’s possible that it simply means that he and his wife were in one bed and the children were in another. Whatever it means, Jesus says, if the man gets up to open the door, then the whole family will be disturbed and therefore, they too would have to get up, Luke 11:7.
The point of the parable is simply this, the friend will get up, not because they’re friends, but because of this man’s ‘shameless audacity’, Luke 11:8. It’s not the man’s persistence of the request, it’s the timing of the request along with the persistence. This man had boldness and gall to make this request at such an hour, Luke 11:5. The friend in the house gives him the bread because he is such an irritant, Luke 11:8.
Jesus’ point is that disciples should pray boldly with shameless nerve. Prayer is the audaciously bold request for God to do what He has promised. This shameless boldness isn’t for selfish requests, James 4:3, no, we’re revealing our complete dependence on God. We are telling God what is happening in our lives and the things that we need spiritually or physically, 1 John 5:14.
Dummelow, in his commentary, says the following.
‘The connection with what goes before is suitable and natural. Having given the disciples a form of intercessory prayer, Jesus encourages them to persevere in its use, and also in the use of other prayers formed on its model, by a homely parable, the lesson of which is, if a churlish man can be forced by importunity to give against his will, how much more can persevering prayer bring down from the bountiful Father in heaven all good things.’
1. A friend in need.
In the parable we read of a man who was in need. The Bible is filled with example of people in need and James tells us that ‘Religion that God our Father accepts as pure and faultless is this: to look after orphans and widows in their distress,’ James 1:27.
God has always cared for the most vulnerable in society and the chances are there are people in need all around us, begging on our streets or even in our churches. Why not practice this true religion and asks God to help you find someone in need today and help them out, Romans 12:13 / Galatians 6:10.
2. Find out exactly what people’s needs are.
In the parable the man asked for bread because bread is what he needed. There would be no point in asking for water if he didn’t need water and so it is the same with Christians when we pray to our Father, we need to learn to be specific in our prayers, Matthew 6:11 / Matthew 7:9-11.
It’s often said that giving someone physical food often opens up the door to offer them spiritual food, Luke 7:36-40. Why not go out your way today and find someone who really needs some food and then invite them to your home for dinner and show them real hospitality, Hebrews 13:2. Who knows, it may be an opportunity to share the Word of God with them.
3. There’s never an inconvenient to help others.
In the parable the friend inside the house demonstrated his reluctance to help others because it was an inconvenient time. There are times when God may call upon us to help people when it doesn’t fit in with our timetable. I understand there are times when we’re at work that’s it not always possible to stop what we’re doing to help someone.
But there are other times when we’re busy doing other things or out enjoying our hobbies, or we just got to bed after a busy day but helping others must never be put on hold because it’s an inconvenient time. There are times when someone in need, usually needs help straight away. Will you get out of your bed to help someone in need? Why not pray to God and ask Him to help you remember that its more blessed to give than receive, Acts 20:35.
4. Be bold in your prayers.
The man inside the house opened the door and gave the man as much bread as he needed because of his friend’s shameless audacity. God longs to hear from His children and He longs to give us what we really need and the real application from the parable is seen in Jesus’ next words concerning prayer, Luke 11:9-13.
God has given us the offer to make bold, audacious requests to our Lord, Hebrews 4:16. What have you been afraid to ask God to do in your life? When was the last time you went boldly to God in prayer, even at midnight? Psalm 119:62.
There is a progression here of one’s intensity by which we seek God’s help. By faith, one must seek God according to His will. As opposed to the self-righteous hearts of dogs who continually reject all righteousness, the humble-hearted must intensify their dependence on God for direction in life. We need to believe that God will provide.
Our Lord is again teaching on the subject of prayer in this context. Asking is making a request with our voice, seeking is the act of pursuing someone or something, and knocking is an effort to open and pass through an obstacle, Luke 11:9 / Matthew 7:7. All three of these verbs are continuous in Greek, i.e., one must continue to ask, seek, and knock, and they seem to be communicating the same basic idea in a progressive manner.
When we pray to the heavenly Father, we must do so seriously, not vainly. Prayer is not to be an empty ritual. To pray correctly, we must not only ‘ask’ for a blessing, but we must also faithfully ‘knock’ and ‘seek’ for the fulfilment of our request, Luke 11:10 / Matthew 7:8 / Luke 18:1-8. Prayer isn’t an opportunity to make requests for things we aren’t willing to work for or are too lazy to sincerely pray for again if the petition is not immediately answered in the affirmative!
Prayers that are pleasing to God are offered from the heart zealously. When a person puts little heart or passion into their prayers, should they really expect God to put much heart into answering them? We must continue to ask, seek, and knock according to the Lord’s will, and He will bless us, Luke 11:9-10 / Matthew 7:7-8. This is a promise of God, and He is faithful to keep His word!
Let me hasten to state that although there are no explicit restrictions placed upon this teaching here, the rest of the New Testament does establish some parameters, Matthew 6:14-15 / James 1:6-7 / James 4:3 / 1 Peter 3:7 / 1 John 3:22 / 1 John 5:14.
I believe one proper application of this verse is that those who are genuinely seeking the truth are going to find it. I do not believe that there is anyone who has lived or will live, who sincerely desired to know the truth, who did not have an opportunity to come in contact with it, Acts 10. No one can truly believe in this promise unless they have great faith in the providence of God.
Jesus illustrates the willingness of God to care for His children. An earthly father wouldn’t mock his son’s request for help by giving a stone or a snake or a scorpion, Luke 11:11-12 / Matthew 7:9-10, neither would God do such a thing in the spiritual realm, Luke 11:13 / Matthew 7:11. It’s the rule with God to answer prayer but how and when He answers is His choice. His wise answers are often not the answers we feel we should have.
Bread and fish were common foods for the peasants of Galilee. Human parents ‘give good gifts’ to their children to the best of their ability because they love them, that is, they wouldn’t give them a stone instead of bread or a serpent instead of fish, Matthew 7:11. But, how much more will God the Creator, whose love and ability to give are infinitely beyond any earthly parent, ‘give good things to those who ask Him!’, Luke 11:13 / Matthew 7:11.
Jesus is comparing human parents, who are ‘evil’, with God Almighty who is perfectly good and righteous in every way. Have you considered that God’s love for you is even greater than your parents’ love for you? This truth must be remembered when petitions are offered to the Lord and not answered as we think they should be.
Our prayers should always centre around the fact that God knows best and He has our best interests in mind, regardless of how He answers. To illustrate that God can be trusted to respond to our prayers, Jesus told the parable of the friend who calls at midnight, Luke 11:5-13.
Hospitality was of paramount importance in the biblical world, and when a guest arrived, even unexpected, even at midnight, there was no question that hospitality must be extended. So, when the man in the story finds himself without enough bread for his guest, he goes to a friend and asks to borrow some, even though he must wake up his friend’s entire household.
Hearers today might empathize with the woken-up friend and think that the midnight caller is pushing the limits of friendship, Luke 11:7. But in the culture of the biblical world, it is the woken-up friend who is behaving badly. The ability of his friend to provide hospitality, and thus his honour, is at stake.
Jesus says that the man will eventually respond to his friend’s request, not because he is a friend, but because of his friend’s shamelessness, Luke 11:8. His friend displays no shame in asking for help to meet the requirements of hospitality. The woken-up friend would incur dishonour if he failed to help his neighbour in this essential obligation. So, he will respond because of social pressure at the very least.
Jesus’ parable implies that if it is so among friends with their mixed motives and self-interest, how much more so with God who wants to give us what is good and life-giving, and who is invested in keeping God’s name holy. The discourse in Luke comes later in Jesus’ ministry and nearer to Pentecost than does the Sermon on the Mount, recorded in Matthew occurs. Therefore, Jesus can be more specific with reference to the needs of His disciples.
From the passage here, it’s clear that God’s children shouldn’t hesitate to pray to the Father for the measure of the Holy Spirit which has been promised to baptised believers, Luke 11:13 / Acts 2:38, and who is a guarantee of our inheritance, Ephesians 1:13. Luke says that God gives the Holy Spirit to those who ask, Luke 11:13. When this statement in Matthew it is to be considered with Luke 11:13, as both Matthew and Luke are stating that one receives the good things that result from the Holy Spirit. The Spirit is the Father’s very best gift. He’s the gift of Himself to dwell with us and within us forever, Acts 2:38.
The Lord doesn’t just give good gifts, He gives the greatest gifts, James 1:17. As we ask, seek, and knock, let us never view prayer as striving to conquer God’s reluctance but rather as the act of laying hold of His willingness, Ephesians 3:20-21.
Matthew and Mark both speak about the seriousness of the sin of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit and Jesus warning against committing it, Matthew 12:21-32 / Mark 3:28, but Luke doesn’t mention blasphemy or Jesus’ warning against it.
In Matthew 12:22-24, we find the religious leaders accusing Jesus of working for the devil for the second time, Matthew 9:32-34, being the first. Please note in Matthew 12:22-24, we have a man who is ‘demon-possessed, blind and mute’, but in the previous account, we have a man who is ‘demon-possessed and mute’, Matthew 9:32-34.
Luke mentions that the man was ‘mute’, Luke 14:14, but Matthew mentions that the man was ‘blind and mute’, Matthew 12:22. Mark doesn’t mention any man at all. It’s certainly possible that we have two accounts from two different occasions. Matthew 9:32-34, appear to go parallel with Luke 11:14. This man who was demon possessed and mute, was delivered by Jesus who drove the spirit out of him and the man was able to speak, Luke 11:14 / Matthew 9:33.
The crowd were amazed because they had never seen anything like this before, Luke 11:14 / Matthew 9:33, but others, who couldn’t deny what had just happened, accredited the miracle to ‘Beelzebul, the prince of demons’, Luke 11:15 / Matthew 9:34. Beelzebul was the Philistine god who was called the lord of flies, 2 Kings 1:2-3, ‘Beelzebub’ was a combination of two ancient words, ‘Baal’, the name of the old god of the Canaanites, and ‘zebul’, meaning ‘dunghill’, 2 Kings 1:2 / 2 Kings 1:16.
In the New Testament, the prince of demons is the devil, Luke 11:15 / Matthew 9:34 / Matthew 12:24-32, and so they were saying that Jesus was working on behalf of the devil, Luke 11:15 / Matthew 9:34 / Matthew 12:24 / Mark 3:22 / John 7:20-24 / Acts 5:39. How shameful it was that they linked the name of the Saviour with that false god.
Other tested Jesus and asked Him for a sign from heaven, Luke 11:16 / Matthew 16:1 / Mark 8:11 / John 2:18. After everything which Jesus has said and all the evidence of the miracles He has already perform up to this point should have been sign enough that He is the Christ, Luke 11:16 / John 2:18 / John 3:2 / John 4:6 / Mark 8:11 / John 2:18 / John 6:30.
Once again we read that Jesus knows the thoughts and hearts of people, Luke 11:17 / Matthew 9:4 / John 2:25 / Revelation 2:23. Jesus responded to the accusation by telling them if Satan was really driving out Satan, then Satan’s kingdom was being destroyed, Luke 17:17. In other words, Satan can’t work against himself by driving out his own demons.
1. He said that it would be unreasonable and even disastrous for the devil to begin attacking himself, Luke 11:18-19. Civil wars don’t produce strong kingdoms.
Josephus, says the following.
‘I have seen a certain man of my own country, whose name was Eleazer, releasing people that were demoniacal, in the presence of Vespasian and his sons and captains. He put a ring to the nostrils of the demoniac, and drew the demon out through his nostrils, making mention of Solomon, and reciting the incantations which he composed.’
Barnes, in his commentary, says the following.
‘Christ was not satisfied by showing them the intrinsic absurdity of their argument. He showed them that it might as well be applied to them as to him. your disciples, taught by you and encouraged by you, pretend to cast out devils. If your argument be true that a man who casts out devils must be in league with the devil, then ‘your disciples’ have made a covenant with him also. You must therefore either give up this argument, or admit that the working of miracles is proof of the assistance of God.’
Luke records that Jesus did this by ‘the finger of God’, Luke 11:20. Because Jesus was demonstrating God’s power, Exodus 8:19 / Psalms 8:3, they should recognise that the kingdom of God has come upon them, Matthew 3:2, that is, the King has arrived and about to establish His kingdom, Luke 11:20 / Daniel 2:44 / Daniel 7:24 / Luke 1:22 / Luke 17:20-21.
2. Christ explained that He had come to rob the strong man, the devil, taking from him the souls that had been under his control, Luke 11:21-22. Logically, He would need to disarm Satan to accomplish this goal, so expelling demons was a predictable facet of His strategy.
Barnes, in his commentary, says the following.
‘A man could not break into the house of a strong man and take his property unless he had rendered the man himself helpless. If he had taken his goods, it would therefore be sufficient proof that he had bound the man. So I, says he, have taken this ‘property, this possessed person’, from the dominion of Satan. It is clear proof that I have subdued ‘Satan himself’, the ‘strong’ being that had him in possession. The words ‘or else’ mean ‘or how’, ‘how, or in what way, can one, etc’.’
Jesus tells the people it’s time to decide for themselves, they are either with Him or against Him, they either gather or scatter, Luke 11:23. They are either with God or with Satan. They couldn’t sit of the fence with this, Matthew 6:24 / Matthew 12:30 / Matthew 16:24-26 / Mark 9:40, they had to decide one or the other.
Clarke, in his commentary, says the following.
‘If there had been no reality in demoniacal possessions, our Lord would have scarcely appealed to a case of this kind here, to point out the real state of the Jewish people, and the desolation which was coming upon them. Had this been only a vulgar error, of the nonsense of which the learned scribes and the wise Pharisees must have been convinced, the case not being one in point, because not true, must have been treated by that very people with contempt for whose conviction it was alone designed.’
Barnes, in his commentary, says the following.
‘The ‘general sentiment’ which our Saviour here teaches is much more easily understood than the illustration which he uses. The Jews had asked a sign from heaven that should decisively prove that he was the Messiah, and satisfy their unbelief. He replies that, though he should give them such a sign a proof conclusive and satisfactory, and though for a time they should profess to believe and apparently reform, yet such was the obstinacy of their unbelief and wickedness, that they would soon return to their former course. and become worse and worse. Infidelity and wickedness, like an evil spirit in a possessed man, were appropriately at ‘home’ in them. If driven out, they would find no other place so comfortable and undisturbed as their bosoms. Everywhere they would be, comparatively, like an evil spirit going through deserts and lonely places, and finding no place of rest. They would return, therefore, and dwell with them.’
The ‘arid places’, Luke 11:24 / Matthew 12:43, appear to be the figurative places where demons lived, Isaiah 13:21 / Isaiah 34:14. The impure spirit decided to go back to its house only to find it unoccupied swept clean and in order, Luke 11:24-25 / Matthew 12:44.
Dummelow, in his commentary, says the following.
‘Though the evil has been temporarily expelled, nothing good has been put in its place, so that the demon can return. If our Lord had been admitted, the return would have been impossible. The ‘sweeping’ and ’garnishing’ is that empty show of faith and repentance and good works, which only invites a more terrible fall.’
The number seven speaks of completeness. In other words, as many as the house will hold, Luke 11:26 / Matthew 12:45, we see this with Mary Magdalene who had seven demons, Luke 8:2 / Mark 16:9.
Coffman, in his commentary, says the following.
‘These words were doubtless spoken in sorrow. They were a firm, dogmatic prophecy of Israel’s rejection of Christ, reminding one of 2 Peter 2:20. What state is worse than being unsaved? It is the apostasy from which it is impossible to be renewed, Hebrews 6:4-6.’
As Jesus was speaking an unknown woman declares that Jesus’ mother Mary was blessed because she gave birth to Him, Luke 11:27 / Luke 1:28 / Luke 1:48. However, Jesus declares it is those who hear and obey God’s Word are the one who are blessed, Luke 11:28 / Psalm 1:1-2 / Psalm 112:1 / Psalm 119:1-2 / Isaiah 48:17-18 / Matthew 7:21 / James 1:25.
Jesus says to the increasing crowds, they were a wicked and adulterous generation, Luke 11:29.
Barnes, in his commentary, says the following.
‘The relation of the Jews to God was represented as a marriage contract with God as the husband and the Jewish people as his wife, Isaiah 57:3 / Hosea 3:1 / Ezekiel 16:15. Hence, their apostasy and idolatry are often represented as adultery.’
The only sign which Jesus would show was the sign of Jonah, Luke 11:29 / John 1:17, who was in the belly of the huge fish for three days and night, Matthew 12:40, which is a clear reference to Jesus being buried in the tomb for three days and nights, Matthew 16:21 / Ephesians 4:9, and rise from the grave, Psalms 16:10.
Coffman, in his commentary, says the following.
‘Christ’s being greater than Jonah is seen in the contrast between the messages, one secular, the other spiritual, between the messengers, one true, the other untrue, and between the miracles that certified each, one disgorged by a sea monster, the other raised from the dead, Matthew 8:25.’
The Queen of the south is Sheba, Luke 11:31 / Matthew 12:42, who came from a most distant land, to admire wealth and listen to Solomon’s wisdom, 1 Kings 10:1-13 / 2 Chronicles 9:1. Sheba was probably a city of Arabia, situated to the south of Judea, Isaiah 60:6.
Childress, in his commentary, says the following, someone greater than Solomon, Luke 11:31 / Matthew 12:42.
1. Christ was greater in his birth. 2. His wisdom. 3. His temple. 4. His throne. 5. His prayers. 6. In his mansions, and 7. In the sacrifice Christ offered. As one example, Solomon offered at the dedication of the temple ‘twenty-two thousand oxen, and a hundred twenty thousand sheep’, 2 Chronicles 7:5. Christ offered his own blood within the holiest place of all for the sins of all men, Hebrews 9:14.’
Nineveh was the capital of Assyria, Luke 11:32 / Genesis 10:11 / Nehemiah 2:8 / Zephaniah 2:13-15, and the men of Nineveh would stand up at the judgment and condemn this generation is because at the time preaching of Jonah, the city repented, Matthew 12:41 / Jonah 3:5, whereas, the generation in which Jesus lived refused to repent.
Jesus’ disciples are ‘light’, namely, ‘the light of the world,’ Matthew 5:14. The purpose of light is to enable people to see. Light provides 1. illumination, 2. guidance, and 3. warning.
Physical lights shine to dispel darkness, and in so doing serve as guides and warnings, e.g., headlights and lighthouses. Spiritual lights should function in the same manner, Psalm 119:105 / Proverbs 4:18-19. God wants the world to see the truth, and our lights, our lives should reveal His truth, John 8:12 / John 9:5 / Philippians 2:15. His truth should be clearly seen in our lives just as a city set on a hill is seen from all directions.
Think of the foolishness of lighting a lamp and then hiding its light, Luke 11:33 / Matthew 5:15. The purpose of lighting a lamp is to provide light for people to see. A major purpose in following Christ is to provide spiritual light for others to see.
We mustn’t hide under a ‘basket’ or ‘bowl’ for any reason, Luke 11:33 / Matthew 5:15, whether it is fear, indifference, love of the world, misplaced priorities, etc. Truly, we cannot be a secret disciples of Christ, either the secrecy will destroy the disciple or the disciple will destroy the secrecy.
If we light a lamp and put it under a bowl, either the bowl will smother the flame and the light will go out, Matthew 13:22, or the lamp will ignite the basket, burning it away for the light to be seen by all, Jeremiah 20:9. We must let out lights shine, Luke 11:33 / Matthew 5:16.
What does Jesus mean when He speaks of good eyes, bad eyes, darkness, and light? Luke 11:34 / Matthew 6:22-23. Understanding His point isn’t nearly as difficult when we observe that Jesus is contrasting earthly and heavenly treasures in the verses both immediately before and after. Thus, it’s reasonable to suggest that He is still addressing this theme in these verses in the middle.
The eye allows images, that is light inside the body, Luke 11:34 / Matthew 6:22. Our body will be ‘full of light’ if our eye is ‘good’, i.e., healthy, and allows us to see things clearly and in proper perspective. The person with such good spiritual ‘eyesight’ sees money as a tool to help further the Lord’s work and not as something to lavish upon themselves.
But, if our eye is ‘bad’, i.e., not healthy, then our body will be ‘full of darkness’, Luke 11:34 / Matthew 6:23. We will not see things clearly or in a proper perspective, physically or spiritually. It’s entirely possible for us to start with a healthy ‘eye,’ but it can become dimmer and dimmer until it is full of the evils of materialism and immorality.
As Christians we must ensure that the light within us isn’t darkness, Luke 11:35. If our whole body is full of light, and no part of it dark, it will be just as full of light as when a lamp shines its light on us, Luke 11:36.
Constable, in his commnetray, says the following.
‘Jesus, of course, used the body to represent the whole inner person, the personality, in the parable. The person who believes all of Jesus’ teaching will experience full illumination.’
Jesus received and accepted an invitation to eat in a Pharisees house, Luke 11:37, however, the Pharisee was surprised when he noticed Jesus didn’t wash before the meal, Luke 11:38. This was the tradition of the Jews at the time.
I think it would be useful to define what we mean when we speak about ‘tradition’ and ‘God’s Word’. Simply put, a command is a law of God and is sometimes described as the Word of God, Matthew 15:6 / Mark 7:13 / Luke 23:56 / 1 John 3:4.
A tradition doesn’t come from God but is something which has been passed down buy men from generation to generation, Matthew 15:3 / Colossians 2:8. We must also note that traditions can be used in a positive sense, 1 Corinthians 11:2 / 2 Thessalonians 2:15 / 2 Thessalonians 3:6. The problem comes when traditions become as important or more important than God’s Word, Matthew 23:4.
Jesus continually referred to the oral law as the ‘tradition of the elders’ or the ‘tradition of men’, Matthew 15:1-9 / Mark 7:1-23. Some examples in the New Testament alluding to the scrupulous concern of the Pharisees with the fine detail of their legalism are.
So what was this tradition and what was the spirit behind it? They had a hand washing tradition and we know that the priests had to wash their hands and feet prior to entering the Tabernacle, Exodus 30:19 / Exodus 40:12, and it appears it was from this command that the wide-spread practice of ritual washings was practiced, Mark 7:3-4. They added to this the washing of cups, pitchers, and kettles, which they suspected had been made use of by anyone who was unclean.
It was regarding these earth ware items that the oral law said, ‘a hollow container made of pottery could contract uncleanness inside but not on the outside’. In other words it doesn’t matter whom or what touched the outside, but it does become a problem when the inside is involved. ‘If it became unclean, it must be broken and no unbroken piece must remain in your house, which was big enough to hold enough oil to anoint the little toe.’
It was these ceremonial washings which were commanded by tradition, not by Scripture. The religious leaders knew this, but still, they criticized Jesus for not obeying these traditions.
Before every meal, and between every course of the meal, the hands had to be washed. To begin with, your hands had to be free from any sand or dirt, or gravel or any kind of substance. The water for washing had to be kept in a special large stone jar so that the water itself was clean in the ceremonial sense, and to make sure that it wasn’t used for anything else and that nothing else had fallen into it or had been mixed in it.
So to start with your hands were held with your fingertips pointing upwards and then the water was poured over them. But the water must run at least down to your wrist. Now while you’re hands were still wet, each hand had to be cleaned with the fist of the other. Now this meant at this stage your hands were wet with water but that water was now itself unclean because it touched unclean hands.
Next you’re hands had to be held with your fingertips pointing downwards and the water had to be poured over them in such a way that it began at the wrists and ran off the fingertips. And after all that had been done, your hands were now classed as being clean. And remember you had to do that between every course of every meal.
Now if you failed to do this, in Jewish eyes, you wouldn’t be guilty of bad manners. You wouldn’t be guilty of being dirty in the hygiene sense but you were seen as unclean in the sight of God. If you were to eat bread with unclean hands and pardon the expression that was no better than excrement.
If the Romans put a Jewish rabbi in jail, he would use the water given to him for hand washing purposes rather than for drinking and there have been reports of some of these Jews almost dying of thirst.
It was ritual, ceremonial, rules and regulations like that which they considered to be the essence of their service to God. Jesus says that their religion consisted of a mass of taboos, rules and regulations, Matthew 23:23. On the outside they professed religiosity by the performance of religious codes and ceremonies. However, their performance of their religious works did not change their hearts, Luke 11:39. It was God who made man whole, Luke 11:40, He made man in a way that the outward behaviour of the individual should naturally manifest his inward character, Genesis 1:26-27.
Spence, in his commentary, says the following, concerning Luke 11:40-41.
‘Are you not fools to lay down such rules to avoid outward defilement, while within, in the soul, you allow all manner of wickedness? Surely God who created the things we see and touch, created the soul also!’ I will tell you how really to purify, in the eyes of God, these cups and dishes of yours. Share their contents with your poorer neighbour.’
Jones, in his commentary, says the following.
‘Let the Pharisee do one single, loving, unselfish act, not for the sake of the action nor for any merit inherent in it, but out of pure good will toward others, and their whole inward condition would be different.’
Notice that Jesus says that giving a tenth of their spices was right, however, the problem was these religious leaders were only emphasising on the giving because they were living off the contributions of the people, Luke 11:42. And so, in doing so, they totally neglected the more important matters of the law like justice, mercy and faithfulness, Matthew 23:23-24.
This was all about the outward appearance of religion and nothing to do with being holy within our hearts. I guess if they focused so much on their outward appearance, they wouldn’t have to deal with the conditions of their own hearts.
Jesus is basically saying that there are some aspects of the law which are more important than others, justice, mercy and faithfulness are more important in the law than tithing mint, dill and cumin, Luke 11:42 / Matthew 23:23-24.
They shouldn’t have emphasised the lesser principles of the law in order to neglect the more important principles of the law, Luke 11:42. Remember David! Matthew 12:1-8 / 1 Samuel 21:1-6 / Leviticus 24:5-9.
Everything they did was only form public show, 3 John 9-10. They loved their authority, as they loved to sit in places of honour at banquets and the most important seats in the synagogue, Luke 11:43. This was all about the show, ‘look how important we are!’
We can almost imagine them becoming upset with people if no one greeted them at the market place, Luke 11:43, or even took the time to call them ‘Rabbi’, which means teacher, Matthew 23:5-7. Oh how they loved to be seen by people, sit in positions of authority and liked to have a title.
Coffman, in his commentary, says the following, concerning Luke 11:44.
‘In Numbers 19:16, the rule appears which makes every person who touches a grave unclean for a week, that is, ceremonially unclean. Jesus here compared the Pharisees to an unmarked grave which could cause a man to become unclean inadvertently. In a similar manner, but far more seriously, the people who were following the Pharisees, who supposedly were righteous, could be spiritually contaminated through contact with those evil enemies of Jesus. The lawyers were close associates with the Pharisees; and when they saw the drift of Jesus’ teachings, it suddenly appeared to them that they, the lawyers, were being condemned, no less than the Pharisees. Up to that point, the lawyers had apparently been enjoying the strong preaching of Jesus against the Pharisees, whose conduct, actually, was the scandal of the whole nation. Pricked in conscience at last, a lawyer responded.’
After addressing the Pharisees, it appears that one of the experts in the law, wasn’t very happy about what Jesus was saying, to the Pharisees, in fact, he saw it as an insult, Luke 11:45. This tells us that that experts in the law were just as bad as the Pharisees. However, the man’s feelings meant nothing to Jesus and so, Jesus goes on to describe them.
They added so much more rules and regulation to God’s law, they couldn’t keep them themselves, Luke 11:46 / Acts 15:10. They loaded people down with so much extra traditions, they themselves couldn’t carry them and they wouldn’t even help others in the process. They went way beyond what was written, 1 Corinthians 4:6.
Here Jesus continues with the theme of tombs and says they were building beautiful tombs and wonderfully decorated graves, Luke 11:47 / Matthew 23:29. The problem was they were doing all this as if they were showing a lot of respect for the righteous prophets of God, Matthew 23:29. However, at the same time they were claiming to be superior to those dead prophets, Luke 11:48 / Matthew 23:30, this is shown because they murdered them, Matthew 21:33-41.
The Pulpit Commentary, says the following.
‘They boasted that they were better than their fathers; they disavowed their crimes, and endeavoured, by honouring the prophets’ graves, to deliver themselves from the guilt of those who persecuted them. Fair show, with no reality! They professed to venerate the dead but would not receive the living; they reverenced Abraham and Moses but were about to murder the Christ to whom patriarch and prophet bore witness.’
Coffman, in his commentary, says the following.
‘The hypocritical conduct of lawyers in building impressive tombs to the honour of God’s prophets whose words they themselves despised and were in the process of violating, through their opposition to Jesus, was one and the same quality of action as that of killing the prophets.’
It’s clear that Jesus includes Himself here as a prophet whom the religious leaders would kill, Luke 11:49, and it’s also a clear reference to His apostles, whom later will either be killed and persecuted, Luke 11:49 / John 16:2 / Matthew 23:34 / Acts 7:52 / Acts 7:59 / Acts 12:2 / Acts 22:19 / 2 Corinthians 11:24-47.
Notice Jesus says that those in his generation will be held responsible for the blood of all the prophets that has been shed since the beginning of the world, Luke 11:50. Now we know all about the account of Cain murdering his brother Abel, Matthew 23:35 / Genesis 4:8, and we have an account of the death of Zechariah the son of Jehoiada in 2 Chronicles 24:20-21, but we have no record of the murdering of ‘Zechariah the son of Berekiah’, Luke 11:51 / Matthew 23:35.
Whatever and whosever Jesus is referring to here seems to indicate that they themselves, that is, the teachers of the law and the Pharisees were responsible for murdering him. Just because we have no record of this event doesn’t mean it didn’t happen, Matthew 26:1-4, Jesus said it did and He openly said it happened when they were around, in their lifetime and openly blamed them for it.
It’s as though Jesus started from the first murder, Abel, Genesis 4:8 / 1 John 3:12, and went straight to the last murder, Zechariah, before He Himself was to be murdered by them. As I mentioned earlier the teachers of the law and the Pharisees outwardly showed great respect for God’s prophets who stood up for righteousness, but inwardly they were murderers. In fact, even as they were listening to Jesus they were plotting to murder Him. Remember it wasn’t the Romans who were against Jesus, it was these self-righteous leaders, Luke 23:21.
Plumptre, in his commentary, says the following.
‘Men make the guilt of past ages their own, reproduce its atrocities, identify themselves with it and so, what seems at first an arbitrary decree, visiting on the children the sins of their fathers, becomes in such cases a righteous judgment. If they repent, they cut off the terrible entail of sin and punishment; but, if they harden themselves in their evil, they inherit the delayed punishment of their father’s sins as well as their own.’
Jesus says those in His generation will be held responsible, Luke 11:51/ Matthew 23:36. There’s no mistaking what Jesus is saying here, the whole Jewish nation was going to be held accountable, and as we know destruction came upon Jerusalem and the temple was destroyed and so the Jewish nation along with its religion, came to an end in A.D. 70, Matthew 24:1-35.
Because of their own opinions and interpretations of God’s Word, they had lost sight of what God had actually written concerning the Messiah and the kingdom of God. As a result, they had taken away the key to knowledge from others, they themselves haven’t entered the kingdom of God and hindered others from doing so too, Luke 11:52.
Barnes, in his commentary, says the following.
‘A key is made to open a lock or door. By their false interpretation of the Old Testament they had taken away the true key or method of understanding it. They had hindered the people from understanding it aright. ‘You endeavour to prevent the people also from understanding the Scriptures respecting the Messiah, and those who were coming to ‘me’ ye hindered.’ If there is any sin of special magnitude, it is that of keeping the people in ignorance and few people are so guilty as they who by false instructions prevent them from coming to a knowledge of the truth, and embracing it as it is in Jesus.’
When Jesus went outside, He now finds Himself being fiercely opposed and facing an onslaught of questions from both the Pharisees and the teachers of the Law, Luke 11:53. They did this in an effort to try and catch Jesus out, to try and get Him to say something they could uses against Him, Luke 11:54. In other words, they were looking for any excuse to Kill Him.