The triumphal entry is recorded in all four Gospels, Matthew 21:1-11 / Luke 19:24-44 / Mark 11:1-11, and John’s account is the briefest, John 12:12-19. The fact that Jesus had raised Lazarus from the dead, John 11:38-44, was well known by now and the people of Jerusalem and other surrounding villages heard that both Jesus and Lazarus were to be seen together, John 12:9, so typically they flocked to see this ‘show’.
The chief priests realised that Lazarus’s presence now also constitutes a threat to their power, John 12:10, so in their ruthlessness, they decide to rid themselves of this problem. The fact that Lazarus had died and then had been resurrected was now a great source of embarrassment to the Pharisees and other Jews of high religious standing. They wanted to put Him to death in order to prove, to themselves, that they were greater than Jesus.
It is about five days before the Passover feast, Exodus 12:3 / Nehemiah 8:15 / Zechariah 14:4. The ‘next day’, John 12:12, we know from the Gospels that this was the first day of the week. The crowd, already excited at his potential arrival, John 11:56, now hear that Jesus is on His way to the feast, as Jesus and His disciples approached Jerusalem and arrived at Bethphage on the Mount of Olives, Matthew 21:1 / Luke 19:28-29 / Mark 11:1.
Jesus tells His disciples to go to a nearby village and get a colt which was tied, which no one has ever ridden, Luke 19:29-30. John 12:14, tells us that ‘Jesus found a young donkey.’ Matthew 21:2, tells that He sent two disciples to find and bring an ass and colt. Luke 19:30, says, ‘a colt on which no one has ever yet sat’, as does Mark 11:2.
Why would a donkey and a colt both be needed if Jesus only rode one into Jerusalem? The simple answer is that the colt was young and still attached to the mother, and vice versa. They would travel together as a mother and offspring naturally would among many animal species. The donkey was traditionally ridden by kings who came in peace, if He had come on a horse instead, that would have reflected a more aggressive tone.
Jesus said to His disciples, ‘if anyone asks you, ‘Why are you doing this?’ say, ‘The Lord needs it and will send it back here shortly,’ Matthew 21:3 / Mark 11:3 / Luke 19:31. According to Matthew all this was done to fulfil the prophecy of Zechariah, Matthew 21:4-5 / Zechariah 9:9. The disciples go and found things just as Jesus said, and united the donkey, Matthew 21:6 / Luke 19:32 / Mark 11:4.
Some standing by asked what they were doing as does the owner, Luke 19:33 / Mark 11:5. The disciples tell them and the owner what Jesus told them to say, Luke 19:34 / Mark 11:6. This implies that Jesus possibly already knew the person who owned the donkey, hence why the owner gladly did as Jesus asked, Mark 11:6.
Jesus was the first on the back of this donkey. The disciples laid their garments over the donkey to make a saddle upon which Jesus could comfortably ride, Matthew 21:7 / Luke 19:35 / Mark 11:7 / 2 Kings 9:13. The horse was the symbol of war and conquest, and the donkey was the symbol of peace. The disciples only made this connection between Jesus the King of peace, the donkey and the Scriptural quotation after Jesus had ascended and they had received the Holy Spirit, John 12:13. Much became obvious to them at that time.
As Jesus goes, they spread their cloaks in the way, Luke 19:36, and as He was getting nearer to Jerusalem, Luke 19:37, ‘a great crowd’ appeared, Luke 9:37 / John 12:12. In Jerusalem crowded with Passover pilgrims, many of whom would be disciples of Jesus, Luke 19:37. A whole multitude of Jesus’ disciples rejoiced and praised God for all the mighty works they had seen and said, ‘Blessed is the King who comes in the name of the Lord! Peace in heaven, and glory in the highest! Luke 19:37-38 / Psalm 118:26.
In Luke 19:39-40, we read that the Pharisees objected, ‘Teacher, rebuke your disciples,’ but Jesus tells them, ‘I tell you, if these were silent, the very stones would cry out!’ The Pharisees objected, but Jesus tells them that the very things we would assume could never speak or respond, that is, the stones, Habakkuk 2:11, would actually give testimony to the Sonship of Jesus.
If the stones of the city of Jerusalem were in the mind of Jesus when He made this statement, the meaning again would be obvious, Jerusalem would be levelled by the Romans in A.D. 70. Matthew 24:1-35. Jesus was basically saying to the Pharisees, ‘you can’t hide from what is happening right now, even if you could silence everyone, these very stones would have shouted glory to God because even they recognise that it’s God’s Son who is entering Jerusalem’.
The Pharisees didn’t greet the arrival of Jesus with all that much enthusiasm and they wanted Jesus dead, this crowd would make it all the more difficult, John 12:19. They seem somewhat frustrated by these goings-on, and their difficulty in finding Jesus in a quiet, dark alley where that could finish all this ‘foolishness’.
The Pharisees saw Jesus as a serious threat to their position as leaders in the religious community, even if they did have some idea that He was the Messiah, it was now too late to acknowledge Him, that would lose too much. The ‘Pharisees’, who were the Sanhedrin officials, were extremely worried, and they had reason to be because huge crowds were involved, John 12:19.
As Jesus drew near to the city and He wept over it, He foresaw and described the disaster coming to a people who rejected the Messiah, Luke 19:41-44 / Matthew 23:37-40. We can almost feel the emotions of Jesus’ words here.
Barnes, in his commentary, says the following.
‘If thou had known, says he, even thou, with all thy guilt, the things that make for thy peace, if thou had repented, had been righteous, and had received the Messiah, if thou had not stained thy hands with the blood of the prophets, and shouldn’t have with that of the Son of God, then these terrible calamities would not come upon thee. But it is too late. The national wickedness is too great; the cup is full: mercy is exhausted and Jerusalem, with all her pride and splendour, the glory of her temple, and the pomp of her service, ‘must perish!’
The days did indeed come when Jerusalem fell and the temple was destroyed, the days indeed come when not one stone was left on another, Matthew 24:1-35. This was done by Titus in 70 A.D. about thirty years after this was spoken.
All this was done, says Christ, because Jerusalem knew not the time of its visitation, that is, did not know, and ‘would not’ know, that the Messiah had come. ‘His coming’ was the time of their merciful visitation. That time had been predicted, and invaluable blessings promised as the result of his advent, but they would not know it. They rejected him, they put him to death, and it was just that they should be destroyed.
Matthew and Mark give us details about what happened when Jesus approached Jerusalem. As He approached the city, a crowd accompanied Him and another crowd went out whom meet him, Matthew 21:8 / Mark 11:8. The crowd, already excited at His potential arrival, John 11:56, now hear that Jesus is on His way to the feast. Great excitement overtakes them, they have heard of the raising of Lazarus and all the other miracles He had done before. Many must have believed that He was the Messiah and was about to restore the Kingdom to that which was in David’s time.
A welcome for a king is being written of here, as they, ‘spread their garments on the road, also spread leafy branches before Him, Matthew 21:8 / Mark 11:8 / Psalm 118:25-26 / Leviticus 23:40. Many carried branches of palm and spread them over the road, Matthew 21:8 / Mark 11:8 / John 12:13. These were symbols of victory, Revelation 7:9, and of the righteousness and vigorous spirituality of God’s children, Psalm 92:12. They point to the joy of victory, the feeling that everything will now be better. The people were expecting something to change.
People were continually shouting that Jesus was the Messiah, the King of Israel. Jerusalem was packed with Passover pilgrims, ‘was thrown into confusion’, Matthew 21:9 / Mark 11:9 / John 12:13. A popular uprising looked possible and that would bring savage reprisals from the Romans, John 11:48.
‘Hosanna!’ they cry, Matthew 21:9 / Mark 11:9 / John 12:13 / Psalm
118:25-26, this was a joyous call meaning ‘save’ or ‘save us now’. It hadn’t become a simple exclamation of surprise such as we use ‘hurrah’ today. The call had a great deal of meaning to it.
Jesus’ claim to be the Messiah, His so coming is in fulfilment of Zechariah 9:9 / Isaiah 62:11 / Matthew 21:4-5. The crowd of disciples wanted Him to assert publicly that He was the Messiah and He did but in such a way as to assert the peaceful nature of His kingdom, Zechariah 9:10.
‘Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord!’ Matthew 21:9 / Mark 11:10 / John 12:13 / Luke 19:38, is an extract from Psalm 118:25-26. This Psalm was part of the ‘Great Hallel’, Psalms 113-118, recited at the Feast of Tabernacles. They now acclaim Jesus as the Messiah, Matthew 21:9 / Mark 11:9-10 / Luke 19:38 / John 12:13.
The context of the Psalm is of a Messianic tone, indicating that they considered Jesus the Messiah, still expecting Him to establish some sort of earthly kingdom. The balance of the call that rang out seems to confirm this idea, ‘Blessed is the King of Israel,’ John 12:13.
Jesus, having found a young donkey, sat on it to fulfil the prophecy of Zechariah, John 12:14-15 / Zechariah 9:9. John records that Jesus’ disciples didn’t understand what was going on, but they eventually would after Jesus was glorified, John 12:16.
Look at the reactions to all of this, ‘All the city was stirred’, ‘agitated’, ‘went wild with excitement,’ Matthew 21:10-11. Remember that most in the crowd had seen Lazarus raised from the dead, so they would be witnesses to this, John 12:17. The local people informed the visitors to Jerusalem who Jesus was, Matthew 21:10-11. He was the prophet, Deuteronomy 18:18 / John 1:21 / John 1:25 / John 6:14 / John 7:40 / John 9:17 / Acts 3:22-26 / Acts 7:37. But Jesus was more than a prophet, He was the Messiah, He was the Son of God.
We’re living in a society where Christians are being told to ‘shut up’, by the ‘politically correct’ brigade, if we speak out against sin, any sin, we get told we’re judging and need to ‘shut up’.
It’s almost like we’re allowed to have our faith, but we’re not allowed to express our faith in any shape or form as some people will find it offensive. Society is permitted to speak out against Christians, but it seems like time goes on, Christians aren’t being permitted the same freedom of speech to defend their beliefs.
The world can try and silence Christians because they find their faith offensive, but the truth is, God would be even more offended if Christians didn’t share their faith with others. Let’s continue to praise Him and lift up His Holy Name before the world because the time is coming when every being in heaven, everyone on earth, and every demon in hell, are going to bow down and confess what Christians have been confessing for years, Philippians 2:9-11.
Mark tells us that every evening of that week, Jesus withdrew from the city, because it was evening the city gates were closed, Mark 11:11. Jesus returned the next day and went straight to the temple and cleansed it again. Jesus entered Jerusalem at the commencement of the final week of His earthly ministry.
The Temple had taken forty-six years to build, John 2:20, it was started around 20 BC, the main work was finished in 10 BC, which gives us the date of this statement at AD 26. The Temple was still being worked on when it was destroyed in 70 AD. Some of the blocks used in building the temple were 15 feet square by 4 feet high.
The original temple was built on ground purchased by David and built by Solomon, 2 Samuel 24:18-25 / 2 Chronicles 3:1. It was by a long shot, the grandest and rich of the temples, and once it was destroyed its grandeur was never recaptured. It was destroyed in 586 B.C. by the rampant Babylonians.
A new temple, Zerubbabel’s temple, was built in 520 B.C. after its foundations were laid in 536 B.C. Zechariah 4:9. This was rebuilt by Herod in 20 B.C. and the work was paid for before a start was made, and the sanctuary took just 18 months to complete, however, was still going on in Jesus’ time about 46 years later?
It is thought that work wasn’t yet complete in the outer areas when this last temple was destroyed in 70 A.D. by Romans. The site is now being used by Muslims who have built a Mosque, the Dome of the Rock.
Much is currently being said in Israel about rebuilding a temple. However political considerations regarding the current Mosque on the site prevent this. The internal area was thirty-three and a half acres. Some wall blocks were fifteen by four feet. Built with cream-coloured stone, with spikes on the roof. It was topped off with gold. There was also a plaque on the wall which read, ‘a no enter sign’ warning of death to all non-Jews who enter in three languages, Hebrew, Greek and Arabic.
The Temple was divided into two parts, the Holy Place, with the altar of incense, golden candlestick and table of shewbread. The second part is the Holy of Holies, the heart of the temple, entered into only once a year by the High Priest on the Day of Atonement. The different courts emphasised the strata of religious society, the more important you are, the closer you get to the Holy of Holies.
The two parts were separated by a veil, made of thick cloth. This is the veil that separated man and God and it was torn in two at the point of Christ’s death. The Inner court or priests court was reserved only for priests, and the sacrifice was burnt on the alter located there. The Antonia Fortress was a Roman fortress, that they used to keep an eye on the happenings on the Temple grounds.
When Jesus reached Jerusalem, He entered the temple courts, drove out those who were buying and selling. He also overturned the tables of the money changers and the benches of those would were selling doves, Matthew 21:12 / Luke 19:45 / Mark 11:15.
He overturned the tables of the money changers and the benches of those selling doves, Matthew 21:12 / Mark 11:15, and then quotes Jeremiah 7:11 / Matthew 21:13 / Luke 19:46. He also stopped trade from coming through the temple courts, Mark 11:16, and He quotes Isaiah 56:7 / Jeremiah 7:11.
What was it that angered Him? The abuse of the temple courts and total lack of reverence and respect for both the temple and the law is what angered Him.
This had become a recognised institute and was protected by the temple guard on behalf of their superiors, the priests. The market was known among the Jews as ‘The shops of Annas,’ because it was under the patronage of the High Priest and his family.
They took the franchise, so to speak, the monopoly and took their profit from everything that was sold. The market was not supposed to be a place for general merchandise but only for things needed for the temple ceremonies, i.e. sacrifices, wine, oil and salt used in the ceremonies.
Buyers were largely pilgrims who had travelled far but were also used by local Jews who could afford to spare themselves the inconvenience of bringing their own animals for sacrifice. Not only this, but they could avoid the uncertainty of the ‘Official Inspection’ which was compulsory.
Priests examined animals for sacrifice, for flaws or imperfections or disease and I imagine that, in order to boost flagging sales, they would refuse to accept certain animals. Probably many animals failed its spiritual M.O.T.
The money was needed because of the duty of every male Jew who came to the temple to worship, to pay half a shekel for the upkeep of the temple. This was called ‘Temple Tax’. A half-shekel was equal to a third, or a fourth of a Denarius, or a penny and could only be paid in the temple or Jewish money.
But many coinages were in use in the Roman Empire at that time, and pilgrims from abroad usually only had Greek, Roman or Syrian money, which could not be used. Obviously, Jewish money was not likely to be used in the wider Roman Empire. So, their foreign money had to be exchanged into coins that the temple treasury would accept.
We must note that Mark’s and Luke’s accounts of Jesus clearing the temple took place in the last week of the Lord’s ministry, John puts the account at the commencement of His ministry, John 2:13-22. This is important to understand because some believe it’s the same account of Jesus cleansing the temple.
One of the arguments, probably the strongest argument they are able to advance in favour of this theory, is that John does not mention the second cleansing, nor do Matthew, Mark and Luke. I suggest to you, that, far from being an argument against the genuineness of these accounts, this is an argument in favour of their genuineness. There is obviously no attempt on the part of these writers to make their accounts harmonise and you might have expected such an attempt if they had not been genuine.
On the contrary, if you examine the three records carefully, you see that there are several differences, which should make it plain that we are dealing with two separate events. John tells us that Jesus dealt with those who ‘sold’ in the temple, John 2:14, as does Luke 19:45, but Mark, for instance, tells us that, he turned out those who ‘bought and sold’, Mark 11:15. Not just the sellers but also the ‘buyers’ who evidently had taken no notice of the first warning.
Similarly, John says that Jesus told those who sold doves to take their birds and their cages out of the temple court, John 2:15-16. But the second time, again because his warning had gone unheeded, he condemned the sellers of doves along with the rest and overturned their chairs, Mark 2:15.
John says that the Jews challenged Jesus as to His authority, and His right to do this, John 2:18, but the second time there is no such challenge or question from the Jews. John does not report that Jesus dealt with those who carried objects through the temple, Mark 11:16, or the cries of the children, Mark 10:13-16, and the healing of the blind, Mark 10:46-52, and the lame and the apparently favourable reaction from the people, Mark 11:18.
Of course, the first time He cleansed the temple, he was virtually unknown, and His action was resented. But after three years and particularly with the presence of the Galileans, He has more popular support. John does not quote Isaiah 56:7, and the mention of the temple as a ‘House of Prayer for all nations’. Nor that Jesus quoted Jeremiah 7:11, ‘Den of robbers’, Mark 11:17. Nor the fear of the Jewish authorities for the people, Mark 11:18.
In fact, to really accept that there was only ‘one’ cleansing of the temple which the writers have put into two different ends of the Lord’s ministry, I think you have to come to the Scriptures with your mind already made up.
If these two accounts were submitted to unbiased critics, with the question, do these records deal with the same event? I am sure they would see many differences that they would say, ‘the situation in the temple had grown worse’, this is suggested by the words, ‘you have made it into a den of robbers,’ Mark 11:18.
Pilgrims in particular, of course, were at the mercy of these temple traders. What went on, was ‘not’ honest trade, which itself would have been wrong in the temple anyway. This was dishonest trade. No! more than that, Jesus said it was a downright robbery, Mark 11:18.
For instance, one record tells that those who sold doves in the temple court, were at one time demanding a piece of gold for every bird they sold to the poor women who came to the temple for cleansing.
And Rabbi Simeon Ben Gamaliel urged them to be satisfied with a piece of silver. Now if the poor local women were subject to this kind of exhortation, what do you suppose happened to the wealthier Jews, coming in from Rome or from other provinces? And in this way, because they imposed an exchange fee, a great deal of profit was made, a part of which found its way to the priests. The doves are mentioned, Mark 11:17 / John 2:14, because they were required by the law for ceremonies concerned with cleansing, women after childbirth, Leviticus 12:1-8, lepers, Leviticus 14:1-32, and others. So, they too provided a good profit.
Mark reports that Jesus stopped the people from using the temple as a public thoroughfare, Mark 11:16. The people often carried things through the temple court, coming in at the East Gate and going out at the West, or vice versa. In fact, the temple was used as a shortcut between the city and the Mount of Olives.
The Jewish authorities had condemned this practice, according to some scholars. They had said that a sign of reverence for the temple was that no one went up into the Mountain of the temple, with his staff, or shoes, or purse, or dust of the road on his feet; and that no one made it a common thoroughfare.
But it seems that they had not enforced this ruling and so the people were defiling the temple and showing disrespect for it. So, Jesus took the unpleasant action that the authorities neglected to take.
Notice the quotation Jesus uses to cover His actions, Luke 19:46 / Mark 11:17. ‘My house shall be called a house of prayer for all nations’, Isaiah 56:7. This is because the only place that the Gentiles were allowed to enter, the only part of the temple open to them and the only place where they were allowed to pray, was the ‘Court of the Gentiles.’
But how could they pray in a place which had been turned into an open cattle market and money exchange and a public thoroughfare? John 2:14. So, Jesus points out that in allowing these things, the priests were defeating the fulfilment of Scripture.
Notice the strong language He uses, ‘A den of robbers’, Jeremiah 7:11 / Mark 11:17 / Luke 19:46. Remember that Jesus had just travelled to Jerusalem from Jericho, coming, along that notorious Jericho road, where the man fell along with thieves and was helped by a Samaritan, Luke 10:25-37.
Judea in those days was full of thieves and robbers, and they occupied the limestone caves in the hills. But Jesus says that what went on in the temple was every bit as bad as what went on outside.
So, He quotes from Jeremiah’s temple sermon, Jeremiah 7:11. Notice first the reaction of the people, they gathered for Jesus to teach them, Mark 11:17. In fact, these last words were spoken to the people during that teaching, ‘you have made it a den of robbers’, Mark 11:17 / Luke 19:46.
Certainly, the priests were to blame for permitting this traffic to go on, but the people were also to blame for encouraging it by ‘buying’ and they were to blame for using the temple as a shortcut. But there was also healing, the blind and lame came to Him, Matthew 21:14. These poor sick people usually remained outside the temple altogether, because many of them would not be permitted to enter. But they were emboldened by the presence of Jesus, and they came to Him and He healed them, Matthew 14:14.
And notice the shouts of the children in the temple gates. Hosanna! Matthew 21:15. When the leaders asked Jesus if He heard what the children were saying, Matthew 21:16, Jesus quotes Psalm 8:2. Jesus allowed the people to exalt Him to the status of king. So, the reaction to Jesus was favourable, at least from the people.
The reaction to Jesus was favourable, at least from the people but the reactions from the authorities were violent, ‘that they might kill Him’, Luke 19:47 / Mark 11:18. In any case, they would not stone Him in the temple itself, so they had to plan to put Him to death elsewhere, Luke 20:1-6. However, the priests had to exercise caution, ‘for they feared him, because the whole crowd was amazed at his teaching,’ Luke 19:48 / Mark 11:18.
Any of those who had come with Jesus to the city had also come with Him to the temple. In other words, there were many good Galileans present, not just people from the city, who would be under the thumb of the priests and with such enthusiasm being shown for Jesus, it might be dangerous for the priests themselves, if they dared to lay hands on Jesus, Luke 20:1-6.
Any of those who had come with Jesus to the city had also come with Him to the temple. In other words, there were many good Galileans present, not just people from the city, who would be under the thumb of the priests and with such enthusiasm being shown for Jesus, it might be dangerous for the priests themselves if they dared to lay hands on Jesus. Jesus then goes to Bethany to spend the night, He possibly stayed with Lazarus, Martha and Mary, Matthew 21:17 / Mark 11:19 / John 11:1 / John 11:18 / John 12:1.
Early in the morning as Jesus is heading towards Jerusalem, He was hungry, Matthew 21:18 / Mark 11:12, and He saw a fig tree, Matthew 21:19 / Mark 11:12. There were a variety of fig trees in and around Jerusalem in Jesus’ day, but this particular fig tree grew leaves first and then produced fruit.
I don’t believe we are to think that this was the only fig tree in the orchard, but it was certainly a tree which stood out and the reason it stood out to Jesus was because this fig tree had leaves on it but no fruit, although it wasn’t fig season, Mark 11:13.
Out of all the miracles Christ did, this is the only miracle which involved a curse, but why curse the tree? Certainly not for the fun of it! He cursed the fig tree and used it as an object lesson for the disciples.
The lesson was simple enough, Israel as a nation were producing an outward show of righteousness, Matthew 15:1-9 / Mark 7:1-9, it was all pretence, and the religious leaders didn’t produce fruit by accepting Jesus as the Messiah. Jesus is telling us that Israel would no longer produce fruit because they had rejected the Son of God and so God is going to reject them as a nation. Jerusalem and the Jewish nation would come to an end in A.D. 70.
The disciples were amazed at how quickly the fig tree withered, Matthew 21:20. Peter remembers what Jesus did to the fig tree the day before, Mark 11:20-21. It appears that the tree was cursed on Monday morning as Christ was on the way to the cleansing of the temple.
Matthew indicates that it withered immediately, Matthew 21:19, but the following morning Peter noticed that it was withered completely from its roots upward and totally dried up, Matthew 21:20. They probably didn’t notice this on Monday evening as they returned to Bethany because it was evening time, and it would have been dark.
In Matthew 21:21-22, Jesus replies to His disciples and teaches them a lesson on faith. We must remember that faith isn’t the source of power, God is the source of that power, and the disciples had to learn to trust their source, who is God, Matthew 17:21-22 / James 1:6 / James 5:16.
When Christians pray in faith, we need to trust that God will answer our prayers, there may be times our prayers aren’t answered in a way which we would like or as quickly as we would like but we must trust that He will answer them. We must also remember that there are times our prayers won’t be answered simply because we don’t ask, or we don’t believe God can do what we request of Him and there are times our prayers aren’t in line with God’s will, 1 John 5:14 / James 4:3.
If these words of Jesus concerning ‘a faith which can move mountains’, Matthew 21:21, are to be taken literally, then they literally have to apply to His disciples, not Christians today. This kind of faith was of the miraculous kind, this wouldn’t be the faith of Romans 5:1. This is a miraculous faith that enabled one to ‘remove mountains’, 1 Corinthians 13:2 / Matthew 17:20 / James 5:14-15. This kind of faith, along with all the other miraculous gifts have ceased to exist, 1 Corinthians 13:8-12.
Jesus knew that over the next few days the disciples would need to have their faith increased because of the great trials and persecution they were about to go through and they were about to face some huge obstacles of their own and it was going to take great faith to overcome them.
The whole purpose of a fig tree was to produce fruit and as Christians, we too must produce the fruit of the Spirit in our lives, Galatians 5:22-23 / John 16:16 / James 3:17-18. But if we don’t produce the Spirit’s fruit in our lives, we too will end up like the fig tree Jesus used as an object lesson, we become useless, Matthew 7:19 / John 15:1-2. We may not have the miraculous faith which can move mountains today, but we certainly should have a faith which trusts that God can remove any giant obstacles which come our way.
Remember that at this time it was the aggression of the religious leaders that developed the confrontation between themselves and Jesus, Luke 20:1-19 / Mark 11:27-12:12. Jesus had violated their system of religious regulations. He didn’t conform to their system of institutional religiosity. He didn’t fit in with their idea of who the Messiah should be.
Jesus’ bold actions in clearing out the temple stirred opposition, Matthew 21:12-16 / Luke 19:45-48 / Mark 11:15-18. The Jewish leaders thought that the temple belonged to them, so they questioned Jesus’ right to come into it and make such drastic revisions, Matthew 21:23 / Mark 11:27-28 / Luke 20:1-2 / Matthew 7:28-29.
Jesus replied to their challenge with a question. He asked whether John’s baptism came from God or men, Matthew 21:24-25 / Luke 20:3-4 / Mark 11:29-30. John had confessed that Jesus was the Son of God, John 1:34, and by doing so, he confessed that Jesus was greater than he was, Matthew 3:11-15.
They consulted among themselves and decided that it would be politically unwise to answer, Matthew 21:25-27 / Luke 20:5-7 / Mark 11:31-33. Their refusal demonstrated that they were not sincerely seeking truth. Therefore, Jesus refused to answer their question, Matthew 21:27 / Luke 20:8 / Mark 11:33.
Anyone can ask questions, but Jesus was the Master at asking THE question. Jesus asked the Jewish leaders an outstanding question, ‘did John’s baptism come from God or man?’ This is the question that we should ask about every religious practice. Anything that originates in man should be rejected, all that God commands should be carefully observed.
There is an easy way for us to determine whether a given teaching or activity comes from God or man. Everything that comes from God is in the Bible. If a particular doctrine or practice is not in the Bible, it is not from God. We should verify everything we do by this simple test: Does it come from God or from man?
I want to break this parable into three points.
1. ‘The call’.
Jesus asks the Jewish leaders a question. One of the first things that strikes you when you read this parable is the direct way the father approaches his sons.
He feels he has the right to ask them both to go and work in his vineyard and He speaks to both sons in the kindest of terms and says, ‘Son go work.’ Matthew 21:28. Jesus says ‘then the father went to the other son and said the same thing,’ Matthew 21:30. And it’s in this way that God, as the Father gently calls all men and that’s because it’s God who is ever seeking workers. It’s God who takes the initiative to bring the inactive and indifferent into His vineyard.
It’s God who draws people to the Saviour, and how does He do that? John 6:44. Not through a weird dream, not through a fascinating vision, not through an Ouija board, not through a crystal ball. So what is His drawing power? God draws people to the Saviour through teaching John 6:45 / 2 Thessalonians 2:14. People are brought near to the fountain of grace when they learn and receive and submit to the Gospel of Christ.
The father who had only two sons asked each of them to work, He didn’t say it was easy work, but they were called to work. And listen, God’s call goes out to all His children. It’s as worldwide as human flesh, it’s as all-pervading as human needs.
God’s call to His children and speaks to the cheerless and the downtrodden, Matthew 11:28. He summons each and every one of us to preach the Gospel in all nations. Not a single soul is to be left out and that’s because the call is universal and individual. He wants all His children to enter His vineyard and when a person refuses to go in, then they are flatly refusing to acknowledge His authority.
Now does God call us to become Christians, and then for us to just sit around and enjoy the blessings of a Christian life? No! Of course, He doesn’t.
2. The call from God is a call to work.
If you’re for Jesus then you will work for Jesus, Matthew 12:30. When God calls you, it’s not to rest and ease. The father’s desire was for his sons to work, that’s why he called them. Now it’s true that there’s a certain measure of safety and security in the church.
But the church, like a vineyard, is a place of work and all those inside the vineyard should engage in its programme of work. The father’s call had a sense of urgency about it, He says ‘Son, go and work today,’ Matthew 21:28. In other words, there was work, which needed to be done, and it needed to be done that day.
So Christ’s call is for men and women to work for Him today. That’s all the time that there is, it’s our one chance, our opportunity to serve, 2 Corinthians 6:2. If we hold back and put off if we wait until tomorrow to do the work of today. The chances are the work won’t get done and so in effect we’re like the son who bluntly said to his father ‘I will not,’ Matthew 21:29.
3. The workers.
The first son refused his father and rudely said ‘I will not go’, Matthew 21:29. This son offered no reason or no excuse, he simply wasn’t going. The first son made a change for the better, he remembered his ugly mood and the blatant discourtesy he had shown his father. The first son began his day badly but that didn’t mean he had to carry on the rest of the day with the same attitude. He saw no reason to continue in the wrong, so what did he do? He repented.
And what did his repentance consist of? Not just a twinge of sorrow, he could have grieved much without repenting. He repented when he changed his mind and when he went to work in the vineyard, ‘The son said, ‘I will not go’ but later he changed his mind and went,’ Matthew 21:29.
Let’s look at the second son now and notice how polite and respectful he replies to his father’s request, ‘I will go, sir’, Matthew 21:30. Although his brother might refuse his father, he would go. How courteous he is, how sure of success he is. But why then did he fail his father? ‘He did not go.’ It’s not that he deliberately deceived his father. He’s not worked out some plot of intrigue by which he hoped to bankrupt his father. He may not have even been trying to purposely lie to his father. He failed his father because in his father’s presence he probably intended to go.
But in his father’s absence, he found that the doing of the task was more difficult than the saying of the words, James 1:22-25. This son represents the large host of Christ’s would-be followers who profess much but practice little. Many people pledge their loyalty to the Master and then they fall down on their pledge. They praise love but don’t practise love. It’s like a profession without practice, a promise without performance. And when people have this type of attitude, they continue to be the greatest enemy of the cause of Christ.
Jesus asks the Jews which of the two did the will of the Father? Matthew 21:31. There’s a lot of emphasis on the word ‘did’ in that verse, it’s the Greek word ‘poyeh’o’ and it means ‘to agree or make a deal’. It’s the idea of doing something without any delay. In other words, Jesus asked the Jews, ‘which of the two without any delay done what the father wanted them to do?’
Out of all the questions, Jesus could have asked them, He asked them the most important question of all, ‘which one did the will of their father?’ They said, ‘the first,’ and answered correctly, Matthew 21:31. All else is of no consequence, no matter how good the intentions, no matter how many the promises, the simple fact is that one son did and one son didn’t. Fine words can never take the place of fine deeds and it’s now that Jesus tells them they have just condemned themselves.
The tax collectors and sinners had turned from their ways but the Jewish authorities had made no amends and had cast aside the heavenly kingdom. What an insult this must have been for them, imagine the anger and rage in their hearts as Jesus tells them that these so-called unclean people, Matthew 21:31-32.
The people that the Pharisees and the teachers of the Law hated so much were now in a better spiritual condition than they have ever been. I would imagine them fuming, no wonder they wanted to kill Him and get Him out of the way.
Now the meaning of this parable is crystal clear. The first son who wouldn’t work but later decided to work represents the tax collectors and prostitutes or sinners as some translations have it. All their lives by their wicked deeds they had been saying ‘no’ to God. But when Jesus comes along, they could no longer continue in their sin but pressed on to enter the kingdom, Luke 12:35-40.
The second son represents the leaders of the Jews, the Pharisees and the Sadducees. And they were always making the pretence of serving God but when Jesus came along they didn’t accept Him as the tax collectors and prostitutes did. They despised His teachings and they hated Him so much they would eventually crucify Him on a cross. They had rejected John the baptiser and they had rejected Jesus as the Christ and wouldn’t accept His authority.
Dummelow, in his commnetray, says the following, concerning Matthew 21:32.
‘The Pharisees had no excuse for neglecting the preaching of John, for it was based on the Law which they idolised, and ran counter to none of their cherished convictions. The preaching of Christ was different, and could not easily be received by strict Jews, unless they had first passed through the preliminary baptism of John.’
Some people like to say that this is a parable about ‘The wicked tenants’ but by the time we have finished, you’ll see that it’s more like the parable of ‘The rejected Son’. We all know what the Pharisees and Sadducees were like, they hated Jesus, and they were always plotting for a way to get rid of Him. And there were many reasons for this but one of the main reasons they wanted Jesus out of the way was because they couldn’t or wouldn’t accept who Jesus was. They were always questioning His authority, Mark 1:21-22 / Mark 11:27-33.
They wouldn’t answer Him because they feared the people. And it’s with this final rejection of the source of the Lord’s authority that Jesus goes on to tell them the parable. This parable tells us a lot about our God, mankind and Jesus Himself. First, let’s look at what it says about our God. This parable tells us four things about our God.
1. Our God is a gracious God.
The Jewish leaders forgot to look back into their history and recognise just exactly who they were and where they came from. In Ezekiel 16 we find a very graphic picture of what the nation of Israel was like when God took them under His care, Ezekiel 16:4-7. And then God goes on to describe how they grew up into something beautiful and how they were like a queen.
But what a pathetic and helpless and hopeless picture this is. These religious leaders had forgotten just who they were and where they came from. They were God’s people and God owned them. It was God who made them into the nation that they were. It was God who cared for them when they were lying by the side of the road hopeless.
And when Jesus says that a man planted a vineyard, Matthew 21:33 / Luke 20:9 / Mark 12:1, He’s telling us that man was God, it was God who planted the vineyard. And notice that the vineyard was given everything it needed to do its work. It was given a wall around it to mark out its boundaries, to keep out robbers and to defend it from wild boars, Matthew 21:33 / Mark 12:1.
There was also a winepress in the vineyard where people would trample all over the grapes with their feet, Matthew 21:33 / Mark 12:1. And underneath the winepress, there was a wine vat and that’s where all the juice from the grapes would flow. And they were given a tower, Matthew 21:33 / Mark 12:1, and it’s in this tower that the wine would be stored, and the people would also live there too. And it’s from there, that they could look out for robbers at harvest time, that’s why it’s called a watchtower, Isaiah 5:2. The vineyard owner gave the vineyard everything it needed to make their work easy and profitable.
And notice that God didn’t just give them a task to do, He also gave them the means by which to do those tasks, 1 Peter 4:10. When Jesus is talking about those who were given talents, He said one had five talents another had two talents and yet another had one talent. But Jesus clearly tells us in Matthew 25, that all were given a talent. But He says, we have a talent, and we need to use and develop that talent the best we can because if we don’t, He will give it to someone else who will use it, Matthew 25:28.
2. God trusts us enough to do the work at hand.
The owner of the vineyard went away on a journey, Luke 20:9. God trusted the tenants to run the vineyard by themselves while He was away. The responsibility of sharing the good news about Jesus Christ with people is in our hands, Matthew 28:19-20. God trusts us enough to do that and He trusts us enough to give us freedom of choice about how we do that and how we live our lives.
God has entrusted us to look after His work here on earth but unlike those tenants, we don’t have any rights. We don’t have any right to abuse the Word of God. We don’t have any right to compromise the Word of God. We don’t have any right to abuse any of the gifts He has given us. But God trusts us enough to allow us to make mistakes and do so much for ourselves.
3. Our God is patient.
Notice how the master sent servant after servant, Matthew 21:34-37 / Luke 20:10-12 / Mark 12:2-5. We know that Jeremiah was a prophet of God who was beaten up time and time again by the so-called leaders of God’s people, Jeremiah 37:15. Uriah is another prophet that was killed by the so-called leaders, Jeremiah 26:23. Zechariah was another prophet who was killed by the so-called leaders, 2 Chronicles 24:21.
Hebrews 11:37, tells us that many of God’s servants ‘Were stoned; they were sawed in two, they were put to death by the sword. They went about in sheepskins and goatskins, destitute, persecuted, and mistreated.’ These servants of God were God’s holy prophets who were treated like this. And even after the first one was abused and ill-treated, God still didn’t get angry with them and come after them with vengeance. Oh no! He gave those tenants chance after chance, to respond to His appeals.
And He does the same with people today. He doesn’t cast us away after we sin as Christians. He gives us chance after chance to live holy lives and gives those who aren’t Christians time to become Christians, 2 Peter 3:9.
Notice that Jesus doesn’t call Himself a servant here, Matthew 21:37-38 / Luke 20:13-15 / Mark 12:6-8. He deliberately removes Himself from the succession of prophets. He says they were servants, but He is the Son. And so, because Jesus was always being questioned about His authority, He tells them right to their face, that He is the Messiah.
They knew that He was the heir, they knew they were going to kill Him, Matthew 21:38-39 / Luke 20:14-15 / Mark 12:7-8. He says they were servants, but He is the Son, Matthew 28:18 / John 13:3 / John 17:2 / Hebrews 1:2.
4. God will serve justice.
These tenants pushed their luck, they pushed God’s patience, 2 Peter 3:10. And like this parable tells us, the world can push its luck with its disobedience and rebellion but there’s a time coming when justice will be done. People will either be born again or wish they hadn’t been born at all, Hebrews 9:27.
And unlike the world believes, our God has the right to judge the world. Our God is a patient God and He as the owner of our souls has the right to expect us to work in the field with the gifts He has given us. He has given us everything we need for life and godliness, 2 Peter 1:3.
It’s because of their lack of faithfulness to God, that Jesus asks these leaders the question, Matthew 21:40 / Luke 20:15 / Mark 12:9. These tenants pushed their luck, they pushed God’s patience. And like this parable tells us, the world can push its luck with its disobedience and rebellion but there’s a time coming when justice will be done, 2 Peter 3:10 / Hebrews 9:27.
Our God is a patient God and He as the owner of our souls have the right to expect us to work in the field with the gifts He has given us. He has given us everything we need for life and godliness, 2 Peter 1:3.
This parable also tells us two things about mankind.
1. Mankind thinks it can get away with sin.
Sometimes in the world’s judicial system people fall through the cracks and get away with their crimes, but God’s justice system doesn’t have any cracks. Remember God’s people hadn’t heard a word from God for four-hundred years, they hadn’t heard a word from any prophet until John the baptiser came along. Out of sight, out of mind, is the phrase they might have used.
They must have thought that God was too far away to do anything about the situation. Luke tells us in his account in Luke 20:9, that He was away for a ‘long time’. And so, because of that silence, they may have thought that God was dead and out of the picture. Oh, but how wrong they were and how wrong people are today who think that there’s no God or He’s a dead God.
People today think they can get away with their sinful behaviour, but our God is very much alive, Acts 14:15 / Revelation 1:18. We don’t come together every week to remember a dead God, our God is alive and well today and when He returns the whole world is going to know about it.
2. We can lose our privileges.
This parable has the story of what was still to come. The Jews had all the privileges of being God’s chosen people. They also had many responsibilities, which went along with those privileges. But these people enjoyed all the blessings from God. He looked after them, He provided their everyday needs, He provided wisdom and guidance, food and shelter. He took care of all their needs as we looked at earlier.
And as soon as Jesus mentioned a vineyard, the Jews would know exactly what it meant. They would cast their minds back to Isaiah 5, where Isaiah is talking about the vineyard. The problem is this parable doesn’t mean much to us today but to a Jew Isaiah 5:1-7, was a very important part of Israel’s history, which they couldn’t ignore or forget.
Have you ever sat and listened to a sermon and thought to yourself, is that preacher speaking about me? Is God speaking to me through that preacher? Sometimes we think maybe He’s not speaking about us, but there are times when it’s so much in our face, that we know that God is speaking to us.
The religious leaders knew exactly what Jesus was going on about. These tenants or Jewish leaders knew Jesus was speaking about them but as usual, they failed to listen and do their job. In Matthew 23, we find Jesus talking about the so-called spiritual leaders of the Jewish nation and he says in Matthew 23:16, ‘Woe to you, blind guides!’ He calls them ‘Blind fools!’ in Matthew 23:17.
In Matthew 23:19, He calls them ‘Blind men!’ In Matthew 23:23, He says, ‘Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites!’ And on and on He goes. But the point is that the Jewish leaders were supposed to produce the fruit, Matthew 21:34 / Luke 20:10 / Mark 12:2, and they were supposed to protect the rest of the vineyard. They were supposed to watch out for robbers, but they didn’t because they didn’t do their job properly.
And it’s because of their lack of faithfulness to God, that Jesus asks these leaders ‘what then will the owner of the vineyard do? He will come and kill those tenants and give the vineyard to others,’ Matthew 21:40 / Matthew 21:43 / Luke 20:15 / Mark 12:9.
In other words, all the privileges, all the responsibilities of being a child of God were going to be taken away from the Jews and given to a people who will be grateful for everything He has done and will do for them, Matthew 21:41 / Luke 20:16 / Mark 12:9.
The Jewish nation will be done away with, and another nation will be raised. A nation of people who will obey His words and take their responsibilities seriously, a nation of Christians. And that would have hurt, ‘the Gentiles being a part of the kingdom of God. Never!’ A Jew would say. All the privileges the Jews had with God were now going to be available to all who would be obedient to the Gospel of Christ, Ephesians 3:4-6.
Those listening to Jesus are clearly shocked by His words and say, ‘God forbid!’ Luke 20:16. And so, it’s then that Jesus quotes Psalm 118:22-23 / Matthew 21:42 / Luke 20:17 / Mark 12:10-11. This stone, which was the keystone for the building, the most important stone of all, was being rejected, Matthew 21:44 / Luke 20:18.
The Jewish leaders rejected the Christ, their long-awaited Messiah, Isaiah 8:14-15 / Isaiah 28:16 / Daniel 2:44-45 / Zechariah 12:3 / Romans 9:33 / 1 Peter 2:8. The Jewish leaders rejected Christ, their long-awaited Messiah. Despite knowing this, they didn’t want to accept Him, Matthew 21:45-46 / Luke 20:19 / Mark 12:12. This was a right in your face parable.
The stone the Jewish leaders rejected has now become the cornerstone of a new building, the church, Acts 4:8-12. In other words, the life, death and resurrection of Christ, the very words and the teachings of Christ are the very foundation that Christianity is built.
All the privileges, all the responsibilities of being a child of God were going to be taken away from the Jews and given to a people who will be grateful for everything He has done and will do for them, Matthew 21:43-44.
Jesus was the stone of Daniel 2, that broke into pieces and consumed all the power that was exerted by world kingdoms, Daniel 2:24-25 / Daniel 2:44-45. The Jewish nation will be done away with, and another nation will be raised. A nation of people who will obey His words and take their responsibilities seriously, a nation of Christians. And that would have hurt, ‘the Gentiles being a part of the kingdom of God. Never!’ a Jew would say, Ephesians 3:4-6. All the privileges the Jews had with God were now going to be available to all who would be obedient to the Gospel of Christ.
They understood what Jesus was talking about with the parable, the chief priests and Pharisees didn’t want to accept Him, Matthew 21:45-46 / Luke 20:19 / Mark 12:12. Instead, they looked for a way to arrest Him but because of fear of the people, they couldn’t at this time. They knew even the people believed that was a prophet. And so, because Jesus was always being questioned about His authority, He tells them right to their face, that He is the Messiah. They knew that He was the heir, they knew they were going to kill Him, Luke 20:18.
In Matthew we find Jesus talking about the so-called spiritual leaders of the Jewish nation and he calls them, ‘blind guides! Matthew 23:16. He calls them ‘Blind fools!’ Matthew 23:17. He calls them, ‘Blind men!’ Matthew 23:19, and He calls ‘hypocrites!’ Matthew 23:23.
But the point is that the Jewish leaders were supposed to produce the fruit, and they were supposed to protect the rest of the vineyard. They were supposed to watch out for robbers, but they didn’t because they didn’t do their job properly. They rejected Him, John 1:11 / John 3:16, and they crucified Him outside the city, 1 Corinthians 2:8 / Hebrews 13:12-13.
When it comes to dying most of us don’t know how or when that’s going to happen. But Jesus knew when and how He was going to die. The cross of Christ didn’t come as a surprise to Jesus but it was still a brutal and shameful way to die, Hebrews 10:5-10. Jesus Christ was born to die, that’s why He came to earth in the first place. He knew He was going to have to suffer and be mocked both physically and mentally. But it’s because of His willingness to go to the cross, that we can come together and worship Him every week.
The stone the Jewish leaders rejected has now become the cornerstone of a new building, the church, Acts 4:8-12. In other words, the life, death and resurrection of Christ, the very words and the teachings of Christ are the very foundation that Christianity is built upon. And what a privilege that is, to be a part of God’s kingdom. The question is, what are we going to do with Him? Are we going to reject Him as our Saviour or are we going to accept Him as our Saviour?
The Jews were awaiting their Messiah, He came, and they missed it. If you’re not a Christian today, then like we said earlier, God is patient with you, not wanting you to perish, 1 Peter 3:9. But He offers you salvation today, He wants to be your personal Saviour, so don’t be like the Jews and miss out.