Gill, in his commentary, gives us a useful summary of this chapter.
‘The genealogies of the several tribes being given, according to as they were written in the books of the kings of Israel, 1 Chronicles 9:1, an account follows of those who first settled in Jerusalem after their return from the Babylonish captivity; of the Israelites, 1 Chronicles 9:2, of the priests, 1 Chronicles 9:10 of the Levites, and of the charge and offices of several of the priests and Levites, 1 Chronicles 9:14, and the chapter is concluded with a repetition of the genealogy of the ancestors and posterity of Saul king of Israel, 1 Chronicles 9:35.’
This chapter tells us about the genealogies of the twelve tribes of Israel. Once again, there are some differences between the names listed here and the list of names given in Nehemiah 11:1-19.
Gill, in his commentary, gives us a useful introduction to this chapter.
‘The genealogies of the several tribes being given, according as they were written in the books of the kings of Israel, 1 Chronicles 9:1, an account follows of those who first settled in Jerusalem after their return from the Babylonish captivity, of the Israelites, 1 Chronicles 9:2, of the priests, 1 Chronicles 9:10, of the Levites, and of the charge and offices of several of the priests and Levites, 1 Chronicles 9:14, and the chapter is concluded with a repetition of the genealogy of the ancestors and posterity of Saul king of Israel, 1 Chronicles 9:35.’
It was the priests, Levites and temple servants, Nethinim, KJV, who returned to the land first. The writer focuses on the tribes of Judah, Benjamin, Ephraim and Manasseh.
Poole, in his commentary, says the following.
‘No longer was there a kingdom of Judah and another kingdom of Israel; now they were all Israelites. Called here by the general name of Israelites, which was given to them before that unhappy division of the two kingdoms, and now is restored to them when the Israelites are united with the Jews in one and the same commonwealth, so that all the names and signs of their former division might be blotted out.’
The ‘official in charge of the house of God’ is usually a reference to the high priest, 2 Chronicles 31:10 / 2 Chronicles 31:13, but we must note this isn’t the case in 2 Chronicles 35:8.
The Netophathites were those who lived in the city of Netophah, or it could be a group of villages located near Bethlehem, Nehemiah 7:26.
Here we read about the Levite gatekeepers, 1 Chronicles 26:1-19, or the Nethinim, KJV, Numbers 3:9 / Numbers 8:19. The name Nethinim was also applied to the Midianites and Gibeonites who helped the Levites in the temple service, Numbers 31:47 / Joshua 9:27.
Because the Gibeonites worked helping out in the temple, their genealogy is also recorded in Ezra 2:43-58 / Ezra 4:43-58 / Nehemiah 10:28. The Gibeonites were also considered a part of the covenant relationship that Israel had with God, Deuteronomy 29:11 / Nehemiah 10:28.
Phinehas, the son of Eleazar, is mentioned because of his faithful work during the days of Moses, Numbers 25:7-13, and his faithfulness to God continued as a gatekeeper in the days of Ezra.
Notice there is a lot said concerning how David organised the different ministries for temple worship, but not much is said concerning Samuel organising the tabernacle.
Both Meshelemiah and Zechariah are mentioned as serving David, 1 Chronicles 26:8-11, in the tent of meeting, this would be the tabernacle.
Barnes, in his commentary, says the following concerning Mattithiah.
‘He was the first-born of Shallum the Korahite, this Shallum would seem to be the person mentioned in 1 Chronicles 9:19, whose actual first-born was Zechariah, 1 Chronicles 26:2. Mattithiah may have been his eldest lineal descendant at the time here spoken of.’
The genealogy mentioned in these verses is an introduction to the reign of David that begins in 1 Chronicles 10.
Coffman, in his commentary, says the following.
‘1 Chronicles 9:35-44 is a duplicate of 1 Chronicles 8:29-38. Twelve generations of King Saul are listed here, and the reason for their being repeated would appear to be that they are an appropriate background for the record of the death of Saul, related in the very next chapter.’
Selman, in his commentary, says the following.
‘Since the genealogy continues for twelve generations after Saul, the fact that his dynasty crashed and his kingship was transferred to David did not remove his family’s place in Israelite history. They too had lived in Jerusalem, 1 Chronicles 9:38, and though we do not know whether this continued after the exile, even for them there were signs of hope.’
Gill, in his commentary, says the following concerning Gibeon.
‘Whose name is here mentioned, which is not in 1 Chronicles 8:29. Jehiel, whose wife’s name was Maakah, as there, but here called his sister, as a wife sometimes is, Genesis 20:2. From hence to the end of the chapter is a repetition of the ancestors and posterity of Saul king of Israel; which is made to lead on to and connect the following history of the kings of Judah, begun in this book, and carried on in the next unto the Babylonish captivity, 1 Chronicles 8:29.’
Coffman, in his commentary, says the following.
‘This brings us to the end of these amazing genealogies. These genealogies are the skeletal framework of the entire Old Testament. They bind the whole book together and afford the most convincing demonstration that the Old Testament is genuine history as contrasted with myth or legend.’