Ezra tells us that these are the people of the province who came up from the captivity of the exiles, whom Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon had taken captive to Babylon, they returned to Jerusalem and Judah, each to their own town, Ezra 2:1. These were the religious leaders of those who had returned from captivity, Nehemiah 7:6-73.
The Broadman, Bible Commentary, says the following.
‘The return from exile was not an ‘all at once’ experience. It went on somewhat gradually over a period of years and this list might have been revised or corrected from time to time and some scholars believe that it included some who had never been in captivity at all, ‘but who were in full sympathy with the returnees.’
Clarke, in his commentary, says the following.
‘Where the word children is found in this table, prefixed to the name of a man, it signifies the descendants of that person, as from Ezra 2:3-21. Where it is found prefixed to a place, town, it signifies the inhabitants of that place, as from Ezra 2:21-35.’
After reading through this list of names, we find there are seven distinct groups of people mentioned.
1. The leaders, Ezra 2:2. 2. The men of Israel, Ezra 2:2-35. 3. The priests, Ezra 2:36-39. 4. The Levites, Ezra 2:40-42. 5. The temple servants, Ezra 2:43-54. 6. The sons of Solomon’s servants, Ezra 2:55-58. 7. Those of uncertain genealogy, Ezra 2:59-62.
Zerubbabel, Ezra 2:2, whose name means ‘seed of Babylon’, possibly because he was born there, appears as the leader of the return to Jerusalem. He’s usually described as the son of Shealtiel, Ezra 3:2, but 1 Chronicles 3:19, describes him as the son of Shealtiel’s brother Pedaiah. It’s probable that Shealtiel died childless, whereupon a Levirate marriage, Deuteronomy 25:5-10, resulted in the birth of Zerubbabel, who was thus the actual son of Pedaiah but the legal son of Shealtiel.
Notice the name Nehemiah, Ezra 2:2, this isn’t the same Nehemiah who returned to the land in order to rebuild the walls of Jerusalem, Nehemiah 1:1-13. Also, notice the name Mordecai, Ezra 2:2, this isn’t the same Mordecai who was the cousin of Esther, Esther 2:5-6. The event which is taking place here happened before the events of Esther and the later coming of Nehemiah.
Although we may find genealogies very boring to read, to the Jew they were vitally important, especially when it comes to possession of the land.
Clarke, in his commentary, says the following concerning Ezra 2:33.
‘These were cities in the tribe of Benjamin; see on 1 Chronicles 8:12.’
The total number of Levites was actually less than the number of priests that returned. This means that a remarkably small percentage of the Levites returned from Babylon. The priests were the descendants of Aaron and they were blessed to work in God’s temple, Ezra 2:36-39 / 2 Chronicles 31:19. Most of the priests stayed behind in Babylon.
Coffman, in his commentary, says the following.
‘It is very significant that the priests listed here numbered 4,287, a tenth of the entire number who returned. Why was this? It reflects the fact that they had most to gain from it.’
The Levites are mentioned not for the purpose of owning land, because God was their inheritance, Deuteronomy 10:8-9, they are mentioned in order to prove that they were from the tribe of Levi so that they could serve as priests in God’s temple and minister to God’s people, Ezra 2:40-42 / Numbers 3:3-37 / Numbers 4:3. You will notice that only three-hundred and forty-one Levites retuned.
Rawlinson, in his commentary, says the following.
‘Jealousy of the priests, like that which animated Korah, Numbers 16:1-10, must have grown up during the captivity.’
The temple servants, Ezra 2:43-54, are called the ‘Nethinim’ in some translations. They were the descendants of the Gibeonites, who were made special servants of the Levites and the priests at the temple. The descendants of Solomon, Ezra 2:55-58, were those employed by Solomon who came from other people groups. They came into Israel as foreign proselytes.
Then we have those with uncertain genealogy, Ezra 2:59-62.
Coffman, in his commentary, says the following, concerning Barzillai, Ezra 2:61.
‘Barzillai, of course, was the famous friend of David who aided him during the rebellion of Absalom, a man of great wealth. Barzillai was not a priest; but his children, probably by his daughters who had married priests, and who therefore were indeed true sons of the priests but they had retained the famous name of their distinguished ancestor. The priests, of course, intent on restricting everyone possible from joining their company, rejected their claims. The governor decided against them.’
The Urim and the Thummim, Ezra 2:63, were kept inside the ephod of the priests, Exodus 28:30 / Leviticus 8:8 / Judges 20:18-28 / Nehemiah 7:65. Urim means ‘lights’ and Thummim means ‘perfections’. They were probably two jewels and although no one really knows how they worked, it appears they simply gave ‘yes’ or ‘no’ answers to specific questions.
The size of this entire group is here stated to be about fifty-thousand, Ezra 2:64-67. However, this was only the first wave of repatriation to Israel from the Babylonian captivity and includes only the heads of families. This was only a small percentage of those who had been exiled and their descendants, the great majority stayed behind in Babylon.
Jamison, Faucet and Brown, in their commentary, say the following concerning Ezra 2:64-67.
‘The numbers given earlier in the chapter add up to twelve thousand less than the total of 42,380 given in this verse. Reckoning up the smaller numbers we have 29,818 as given here and 31,089 as given in the parallel in Nehemiah. Ezra mentions 491 not mentioned by Nehemiah; and Nehemiah mentions 1765 not given in Ezra. If we add Ezra’s 491 to Nehemiah’s total and Nehemiah’s 1765 to Ezra’s total, they both equal 31,583, which is a deficiency of exactly 10,777.’
There’s no doubt these first people who returned to Jerusalem were very generous, Ezra 2:68-69.
Clare, in his commentary, says the following.
‘As a weight, the minas was 100 shekels, as a coin, 60 shekels in value, or about £9. 5000 of these minas therefore will amount to £45,000, making in the whole a sum of about £120,000, and in this are not included the 100 garments for priests.’
Coffman, in his commentary, says the following concerning the darics, Ezra 2:69.
‘Archaeological evidence now shows that the Attic (Greek) drachma (the daric of this passage) was in use as a standard coin in Palestine from the middle of the fifth century B.C. and afterward. Archaeologists have actually unearthed specimens of these coins near Jerusalem and this daric became the official Jewish coinage, and specimens inscribed with the Aramaic name of Judah have been discovered.’
Their aim is simply to rebuild the altar so that they can begin sacrificing to the Lord. It’s clear that their offering was more than enough to get the job done. The priests, the Levites, the musicians, the gatekeepers, and the temple servants settled in their own towns, along with some of the other people, and the rest of the Israelites settled in their towns, Ezra 2:70 / Ezra 1:1.