This is a continuation from 1 Samuel 13:23, and it appears that since Saul’s army was down to around six-hundred men, 1 Samuel 13:15 / 1 Samuel 14:3, Jonathan took the initiative to go out by himself. As he didn’t tell his father, 1 Samuel 14:1, he goes secretly basically to teach these uncircumcised Philistines a lesson. And so, he, along with his armour-bearer, made a surprise attack on the Philistine outpost, 1 Samuel 14:1, and killed twenty Philistines, 1 Samuel 14:14.
Clarke, in his commentary, says the following.
‘This action of Jonathan was totally contrary to the laws of war; no military operation should be undertaken without the knowledge and command of the general. But it is likely that he was led to this by a Divine influence.’
Saul was staying on the outskirts of Gibeah under a pomegranate tree, 1 Samuel 14:2. The Hebrew word for ‘pomegranate’ is Rimmon, but there’s no doubt that the tree is meant here and not the rock Rimmon as some have suggested, Judges 20:45 / Judges 20:47. Saul had about six hundred men with him, among whom was Ahijah, who was wearing an ephod. He was a son of Ichabod’s brother Ahitub son of Phinehas, the son of Eli, the LORD’s priest in Shiloh, 1 Samuel 14:2-3.
Barnes, in his commentary, says the following.
‘This fragment of a genealogy is a very valuable help to the chronology. The grandson of Phinehas, the son of Eli, was now High Priest; and Samuel, who was probably a few years older than Ahitub the son of Phinehas, was now an old man. All this indicates a period of about 50 years or upward from the taking of the ark by the Philistines.’
Notice no one was aware that Jonathan had left, 1 Samuel 14:3. On each side of the pass that Jonathan intended to cross to reach the Philistine outpost was a cliff, one was called Bozez and the other Seneh and one cliff stood to the north toward Mikmash, the other to the south toward Geba, 1 Samuel 14:4-5. He says to his armor-bearer, let’s go over to the outpost of those uncircumcised men, 1 Samuel 17:26 / 1 Samuel 17:36 / Judges 14:3 / Judges 15:18, and notice he says perhaps the LORD will act in our behalf. Nothing can hinder the LORD from saving, whether by many or by few, 1 Samuel 14:6.
Jonathon knew that nothing could hinder the Lord, he knew if God was with Him, he could do great things, which was the reason why he was so courageous to go out and attack the Philistines in the first place. Johnathon was setting a real example for the rest of the Israelites here, and if he can convince his fellow Israelites that God can and will do great things through him because he trusted God, then God can do the same for them if they trust Him.
His armor-bearer says to Jonathon, do all that you have in mind, I am with you heart and soul, 1 Samuel 14:7. Jonathon suggest that they cross over toward them and let them see them and if they say to us, wait there until we come to you, we will stay where we are and not go up to them, 1 Samuel 14:8-9. However, if they say, come up to us, we will climb up, because that will be our sign that the LORD has given them into our hands, 1 Samuel 14:10.
Clarke, in his commentary, says the following.
‘Jonathan had no doubt asked this as a sign from God, exactly as Eliezer the servant of Abraham did, Genesis 24:12.’
So both of them showed themselves to the Philistine outpost and they were spotted by the Philistines, who said, the Hebrews are crawling out of the holes they were hiding in, 1 Samuel 14:11. The men of the outpost shouted to Jonathan and his armor-bearer, come up to us and we’ll teach you a lesson, 1 Samuel 14:12.
So Jonathan tells his armor-bearer, climb up after him, the LORD has given them into the hand of Israel, 1 Samuel 14:12. Jonathan climbed up, using his hands and feet, with his armor-bearer right behind him and the Philistines fell before Jonathan, and his armor-bearer followed and killed behind him, 1 Samuel 14:11. They killed twenty Philistines in an area of about half an acre, 1 Samuel 14:14.
It was God who started the panic stations, it was God who made the ground shake, 1 Samuel 14:15. In other words, God was working in this battle against the Philistines, 1 Samuel 7:10 / Joshua 10:11 / Psalms 114:4. The Israelites saw the Philistines melting away in all directions, 1 Samuel 14:16, which basically means they were running all over the place in confusion.
Saul tells those with him to muster the forces and see who has left us and when they did, it was Jonathan and his armor-bearer who were not there, 1 Samuel 14:17. Notice that the Ark of the Lord was with Israel at this point in time, 1 Samuel 14:18. This suggests that the ark was possibly where it belonged, inside the temple.
Willis, in his commentary, says the following.
‘Saul’s bringing the ark from Kiriath-Jearim to Gibeah in a time of crisis is no more out of harmony with the statements in 1 Samuel 7:2, and in 2 Samuel 6:2, than David’s taking the ark out of the tent he had made for it, 2 Samuel 6:17, so that it could accompany Joab and his army in the siege and conquest of Rabbah, 2 Samuel 11:11.’
Saul tells the priests to withdraw their hands, 1 Samuel 14:19. This was a command that meant the priest were to withdraw from their pocket of the ephod the Urim and Thummim. These were the lots, by which the will of God was determined, and although we’re not really sure exactly how they worked, it’s possible they were used to determine ‘yes’ or ‘no’ answers.
Barnes, in his commentary, says the following.
‘Saul in his impatience to join the battle would not wait for the answer from God, which he had desired Ahijah to inquire for; just as later, 1 Samuel 14:35, he would not wait to finish the altar which he had begun to build. Had he now waited he would doubtless have avoided the error into which he fell.’
When Saul and all his men assembled and went to the battle, we see the confusion which has set in. The Philistines ended up attacking one another in the middle of the night, 1 Samuel 14:20. Saul takes full advantage of the confusion which God caused in the Philistine camp and all the soldiers of Israel were encouraged by the leadership of Jonathan and Saul.
Notice the use of the word, ‘Hebrews’, 1 Samuel 14:21. It appears that Samuel, the possible author of the book is making a distinction between the Hebrews and the Israelites. The word ‘Hebrews’ here, 1 Samuel 14:21, is used in reference to the Israelites who had been recruited into the army of the Philistines, whereas the word ‘Israelites’, 1 Samuel 14:21, is used in reference to those who were with Saul and Jonathan. As a result of God’s help, Israel was delivered on this occasion from the oppression of the Philistines, 1 Samuel 14:22-23 / 1 Samuel 13:6.
Saul, rather foolishly, placed the soldiers under an oath not to eat until the battle was finished, 1 Samuel 14:24-26 / 1 Kings 19:2, but it appears that Jonathan hadn’t been informed about this fast and so, he ate some honey, 1 Samuel 14:27.
Clarke, in his commentary, says the following.
‘There were many wild bees in that country, and Judea is expressly said to be a land flowing with milk and honey. Honey dews, as they are called, are not uncommon in most countries; and this appears to have been something of this kind. I have seen honey in considerable quantity on the trees and long grass in the fields, and have often eaten of it.’
One of the soldiers remined him of his father’s oath, 1 Samuel 14:28. Jonathan says to the soldier that his father has made trouble for the country and then he tells him to look and see how his eyes brightened when he tasted a little of this honey, 1 Samuel 14:29.
He then says how much better it would have been if the men had eaten today some of the plunder they took from their enemies, would not the slaughter of the Philistines have been even greater? 1 Samuel 14:30. The foolish oath that Saul imposed on the people is shown in the fact that the Israelites had no more strength to cause a greater victory over the Philistines.
As a result of Saul’s foolish oath, 1 Samuel 14:24, the Israelites were exhausted and starving, 1 Samuel 14:31. This hunger led to them eating sheep, cattle, and calves together with the blood, 1 Samuel 14:32-33 / Genesis 9:4 / Acts 15:20 / Acts 15:29. In other words, they ate the food without preparing it to eat according to God’s law, Leviticus 17:10-14 / Leviticus 19:26 / Deuteronomy 12:16.
Saul apparently used a large stone upon which the animals were killed as part of an altar to the Lord, 1 Samuel 14:33-34. However, notice because he was in such a hurry to chase the Philistines, he only began to build the altar, 1 Samuel 14:35, he didn’t finish building it, 1 Corinthians 27:24.
Saul wanted to continue chasing the Philistines, 1 Samuel 14:36, but the priest suggested that they stop and consult God first, 1 Samuel 14:36. Notice that when they did inquire of God, God didn’t answer, 1 Samuel 14:37.
Clarke, in his commentary, says the following.
‘Why was this answer delayed? Surely Jonathan’s eating the honey was no sin. This could not have excited God’s displeasure. And yet the lot found out Jonathan! But did this argue that he had incurred guilt in the sight of God? I answer: It did not, for Jonathan was delivered, by the authority of the people, from his father’s rash curse; no propitiation is offered for his supposed transgression to induce God to pardon it; nor do we find any displeasure of God manifested on the occasion.’
Because there was no answer, this led Saul to come to the conclusion that there must be sin in the camp, 1 Samuel 14:38. The search for the sinner now begins and Saul says as surely as the LORD who rescues Israel lives, even if the guilt lies with my son Jonathan, he must die and notice that not one of them said a word, 1 Samuel 14:39. Saul then said to the Israelites, you stand over there, I and Jonathan my son will stand over here and they are happy to what he says, 1 Samuel 14:40. Then Saul prays and asks God why has you not answered his servant today? 1 Samuel 14:41.
He says if the fault is in me or my son Jonathan, respond with Urim, but if the men of Israel are at fault, respond with Thummim, 1 Samuel 14:41. The Urim and Thummim are mentioned again here and they are specifically mentioned only eight times in the Old Testament, Exodus 28:30 / Leviticus 8:8 / Numbers 27:21 / Deuteronomy 33:8 / 1 Samuel 14:41 / 1 Samuel 28:6 / Ezra 2:63 / Nehemiah 7:65. However, in many other situations, they are described as casting lots or inquiring of the Lord, they were almost certainly used by the High Priest who wore the ephod.
Jonathan and Saul were taken by lot, and the men were cleared and Saul says cast the lot between me and Jonathan my son and Jonathan was taken, 1 Samuel 14:41-42. It was eventually revealed that it was Jonathan who had eaten against the oath by which Saul had made the people swear, 1 Samuel 14:24. Saul asks Jonathan to explain what he had done, and Jonathan tells him that he tasted a little honey with the end of my staff and now he must die! 1 Samuel 14:43.
When Saul discovered it was his son Johnathon who had sinned, it’s here we begin to see his foolishness. Yes, he started off as a king well, with humility and a person of great stature but now his foolishness was manifested by a rash statement that he would command that his son be put to death if the oath of the fast had been broken, 1 Samuel 14:44.
Notice that it was the other Israelites who came to Jonathon’s rescue, 1 Samuel 14:45. This was a time when the will of the people triumphed over the mindless statement of Saul. The word ‘rescue’, 1 Samuel 14:45, in Hebrew is the word, ‘padah’, which means to ransom or to redeem. In other words, it was the people who redeemed Jonathan from the unrighteous plans of their king. Then Saul stopped pursuing the Philistines, and they withdrew to their own land, 1 Samuel 14:46. I’m pretty sure that this whole event was the beginning of Saul’s downfall as a king. He’s becoming like a dictator and the people are already rebelling against him.
After reinstating his role as ruler over Israel, Saul became very successful in his military campaigns in delivering Israel from the threat of the nations around them. He got rid of all those who were oppressing Israel and taking advantage of them, 1 Samuel 14:47-48. The war against the Amalekites is mentioned in the next chapter.
Coffman, in his commentary, says the following, concerning these verses.
‘The name Ish-Bosheth or Eshbaal is missing from the list Saul’s children, this is probably because that this list was written very early in Saul’s reign, before Eshbaal was born. Abner made Eshbaal king over part of Israel following Saul’s death; and he contested with David for the throne of all Israel for a period of seven years. The significant fact of Eshbaal being forty years of age when he was declared king is the basis for concluding that Saul reigned forty years, 2 Samuel 2:8-11. The theory that Ishvi is the same son as Eshbaal is an ingenious device to avoid the deduction regarding the length of Saul’s reign.’
Barnes, in his commentary, says the following.
‘The only other ‘Ahimaaz’ mentioned in Scripture was the son of Zadok the priest. The word “Ahi” (brother) is frequently found in composition in names in the High Priest’s family, e.g. in Ahijah, Ahimelech. It is not improbable that Ahimaaz may have been of this family, as marriages between the royal and priestly houses were not unusual, 2 Kings 11:2 / 2 Chronicles 22:11, and perhaps it may have been owing to such a connection that Ahijah was brought into prominence by Saul. If there be any truth in the above supposition, it would be an indication that Saul was not married until after his election to the throne.’
Abner was Saul’s uncle and he becomes the captain of Saul’s army, 1 Samuel 14:50. Although Saul was victorious over the majority of Israel’s enemies, the Philistines didn’t give up, they became like a thorn in the flesh for Israel, Numbers 33:55. Notice how Samuel’s prophecy concerning Saul was beginning to be fulfilled, in the fact that Saul took any mighty or brave man and forced him to join his army, 1 Samuel 14:52 / 1 Samuel 8:11.