
Unlike today where some people don’t take vows seriously, God has always been serious when it comes to making any vow, especially any vow which was made to Him, Matthew 5:37.
Here we find God describing a vow which was made outside of the law, a vow in relation to making an offering to the Lord, Leviticus 27:1-2 / Leviticus 26:46 / 1 Samuel 1:11 / Judges 11:30-31.
These vows were not forced on people; they were to be taken voluntarily, Deuteronomy 23:21-23. However, because the vow was made to God, this made the vow binding.
Kellogg, in his commentary, says the following.
‘What has preceded in Leviticus has concerned religious duties which were obligatory upon all Israelites, but the regulations of this chapter, on the contrary, have to do with special vows which were not obligatory, but voluntary, Deuteronomy 23:22.’
Notice how God speaks of the value of the offering, the value was gauged by the age and sex of the offering, and the value was gauged in reference to the Year of Jubilee, Leviticus 27:2 / Leviticus 25:8-22.
A person could redeem a vow for a person, fifty shekels of silver for a twenty to sixty-year-old male, Leviticus 27:3. Thirty shekels of silver for a twenty to sixty-year-old female, Leviticus 27:4. Twenty shekels of silver for a five to twenty-year-old male, Leviticus 27:5.
Ten shekels of silver for a five to twenty-year-old male, Leviticus 27:5. Five shekels for a one month to five-year male, Leviticus 27:6. Three shekels for a one month to five-year-old female, Leviticus 27:6. Fifteen shekels for a male over sixty years old, Leviticus 27:7.
Ten shekels for a female over sixty years old, if the person is poor then the priest can make an estimate that would be within the person’s ability to pay, Leviticus 27:8. Once again, we see God caring for the poor in society, if a person was poor then the priest would give the valuation of the offering.
Coffman, in his commentary, says the following.
‘Leviticus 27:8 allowed the priest to reduce the price of redemption for those unable to pay the full price. The mention of the priest here also shows that these calculations of value were the responsibility of the priesthood, despite the fact, Leviticus 27:1, of the instructions being given to ‘the children of Israel.’ This mention of ‘the ability of him that vowed’ is a vital factor even today in the matter of Christian giving, 1 Corinthians 16:2.’
Making a vow offering of an animal meant that the animal had become holy, Leviticus 27:9. We see that if someone vowed to give an animal for an offering, they couldn’t change their mind and offer money instead; an animal must be given.
They can’t exchange it or substitute a good one for a bad one, or a bad one for a good one, but if they should substitute one animal for another, both it and the substitute become holy, Leviticus 27:10.
If the animal that was given in a vow was unclean, then the priest could value it and sell it, Leviticus 27:11-12. If the owner wanted to redeem the animal, then they could, for the price of the valuation, plus one-fifth the value of the animal, Leviticus 27:13. The same rule applied to houses that were offered to the Lord, Leviticus 27:14-15.
Barnes, in his commentary, says the following, concerning Leviticus 27:14-15.
‘This law relates to houses in the country, Leviticus 25:31, which were under the same general law as the land itself, with a right of redemption for the inheritor until the next Jubilee, Leviticus 27:17-19. For houses in walled towns, the right of redemption lasted for only one year, Leviticus 25:29.’
Clements, in his commentary, says the following.
‘These laws highlighted the need for caution and seriousness in making vows and promises to God. Rash promises may afterward be regretted, and Israel’s law did not permit the man who had made a hasty promise to forget it and do nothing about it. We may well pause to consider how many promises we have made to God and have not fulfilled.’
The Nazarite vow can be found in Numbers 6:1-21. This basically meant they had to dedicate themselves to the Lord. That person had to abstain from all products of the grapevine; no razor was to pass over their head.
They weren’t allowed to go near a dead person, but if someone suddenly died in their presence, they were to shave their head on the day they became unclean on the seventh day.
On the eighth day, they were to offer two turtle doves or two young pigeons as a sin offering and a burnt offering at the doorway of the tabernacle. If they were to offer a year-old male lamb as a guilt offering, they could then dedicate themselves to the Lord once more as a Nazarite.
What they had to do at the completion of their vow was to sacrifice a one-year-old male lamb as a burnt offering. They were to sacrifice at the door of the tabernacle a one-year-old male lamb.
For a sin offering, they were to offer a one-year-old ewe lamb; for a peace offering, they were to sacrifice one ram. They were also to offer a basket of unleavened cakes of fine flour mixed with oil and unleavened wafers spread with oil, along with a meal and drink offering.
Then they were to shave their hair off and burn it in the fire of the peace offering. The priest was to take their portion, and the person who had the vow couldn’t drink wine.
The vow of the women can be found in Numbers 30:1-16. If a man-made a vow unto the Lord, he was obligated to fulfil it. However, if a daughter makes a vow and her father hears it and says nothing concerning it, then the vow stands and is to be fulfilled. If she makes a vow and her father hears it and forbids it, then she is not under obligation to fulfil it.
If a married woman makes a vow and her husband hears it and says nothing concerning it, then the vow stands and is to be fulfilled. If she makes a vow and her husband hears it and forbids it, then she is not under obligation to fulfil it.
If a widow or divorced woman makes a vow, their vows would be binding upon them to fulfil. If they make a vow in their husband’s house and their husband hears it and says nothing concerning it, then the vow stands and is to be fulfilled. If they make a vow in her husband’s house and their husband hears it and forbids it, then they are not under obligation to fulfil it.
The land was very precious to Israel, and so, anyone who owned a piece of land could offer it to the Lord. This all depended upon whether a person inherited the land or bought the land in the first place. The value of the land was based on how much seed was necessary to sow the land, Leviticus 27:16 / Exodus 16:16 / Exodus 38:24.
Remember, the value of the land was given before the Year of Jubilee, and any land which was inherited could be bought back for the value of the land, plus one-fifth of the value, Leviticus 27:17-19.
If the land was not bought back, then it became the permanent property of the priests, Leviticus 27:20-21. If anyone dedicated any property that they had bought, then after the valuation, this land could go back to the original owner in the Jubilee, but only if the valuation was paid to the priests for the land, Leviticus 27:22-25 / Leviticus 25:23-34 / Exodus 30:13 / Exodus 38:24.
Clarke, in his commentary, says the following about the sanctuary shekel, Leviticus 27:25 / Exodus 38:24.
‘A standard shekel; the standard being kept in the sanctuary to try and regulate all the weights in the land by, Genesis 20:16 / Genesis 23:15.’
The firstborn of the animals wasn’t permitted to be given to the Lord, because they already belonged to God, Leviticus 27:26 / Exodus 13:2 / Exodus 34:19. However, if the firstborn animal was unclean, this could be valued and redeemed for the valuation price plus one-fifth of the value, Leviticus 27:27. If it wasn’t brought back then it had to be sold, Leviticus 27:27. The reason for this is because the priests weren’t permitted to own any unclean animals.
Notice if anything was devoted to God, it wasn’t to be sold. This is because it was totally given to God and couldn’t be redeemed because everything so devoted is most holy to the LORD, Leviticus 27:28. In this case, whatever it was which was devoted to God was to be totally destroyed, and the reason was to prevent anyone from using it for themselves.
Barnes, in his commentary, says the following, concerning Leviticus 27:28.
‘This passage does not permit human sacrifices. Man is elsewhere clearly recognised as one of the creatures which were not to be offered in sacrifice, Exodus 13:13 / Exodus 34:20 / Numbers 18:15.’
No person devoted to destruction may be ransomed, and they are to be put to death, Leviticus 27:29. A tithe of the land, the herd, or the flock could be redeemed if the valuation, plus one-fifth, was paid, Leviticus 27:30-31 / Genesis 14:20 / Deuteronomy 14:22 / Deuteronomy 14:28.
Constable, in his commentary, says the following.
‘This tithe was a commonly recognised obligation to God, and for this reason it was not part of the Mosaic Law, Genesis 14:20 / Genesis 28:22. This was one of two tithes the Israelites had to pay, Deuteronomy 14:22-27, the other being the tithe they paid every three years to support the poor, Deuteronomy 14:28-29. Probably Moses included the directions concerning it in this section of Leviticus because this tithe was a gift to God.’
The reference to ‘every tenth passing under the shepherd’s rod’, Leviticus 27:32, simply means that this is what the shepherds did; he gave a tithe whenever an animal was received by him.
Coleman, in his commentary, says the following.
‘Leviticus 27:32 refers to the custom of counting animals by making them pass in a single file out of an enclosure and marking each tenth animal by a rod dipped in colouring material.’
Notice also that the shepherd couldn’t be selective when choosing the animal; he couldn’t just pick out the good ones whilst ignoring the bad ones. If a substitution is to be made, then both the animal and its substitute become holy and cannot be redeemed, Leviticus 27:33. These are the commands the LORD gave Moses at Mount Sinai for the Israelites, Leviticus 27:34.
Something important we need to note about giving is that it was a sacrifice, and it was personal. If I lived in a posh house and offered that house to the Lord, I shouldn’t expect to live in it any longer or enjoy the benefits of owning that house anymore. In the same manner, the Israelites couldn’t give the Lord a field and expect to continue to use it for their own gain.
Leviticus teaches God’s people how they are to approach Him and live pleasing in His sight. Its central command is to ‘be holy’, Leviticus 19:2. We cannot approach God in any way we like; we must approach Him on His terms and under His conditions.
This has been the message of Leviticus: God is going to dwell with Israel, He will be their God, and they will be His people. This covenant relationship continues even today; it is a relationship which is found in the church. We have entered into the promise, which was initially given to Israel, 2 Corinthians 6:16.